aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-08-11ext4: add a new ioctl EXT4_IOC_GETSTATETheodore Ts'o2-0/+28
The new ioctl EXT4_IOC_GETSTATE returns some of the dynamic state of an ext4 inode for debugging purposes. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11ext4: add a new ioctl EXT4_IOC_CLEAR_ES_CACHETheodore Ts'o4-0/+40
The new ioctl EXT4_IOC_CLEAR_ES_CACHE will force an inode's extent status cache to be cleared out. This is intended for use for debugging. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11jbd2: flush_descriptor(): Do not decrease buffer head's ref countChandan Rajendra1-3/+1
When executing generic/388 on a ppc64le machine, we notice the following call trace, VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6637 at /root/repos/linux/fs/buffer.c:1195 __brelse+0x84/0xc0 Call Trace: __brelse+0x80/0xc0 (unreliable) invalidate_bh_lru+0x78/0xc0 on_each_cpu_mask+0xa8/0x130 on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x130/0x170 invalidate_bh_lrus+0x44/0x60 invalidate_bdev+0x38/0x70 ext4_put_super+0x294/0x560 generic_shutdown_super+0xb0/0x170 kill_block_super+0x38/0xb0 deactivate_locked_super+0xa4/0xf0 cleanup_mnt+0x164/0x1d0 task_work_run+0x110/0x160 do_notify_resume+0x414/0x460 ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74 The warning happens because flush_descriptor() drops bh reference it does not own. The bh reference acquired by jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer() is owned by the log_bufs list and gets released when this list is processed. The reference for doing IO is only acquired in write_dirty_buffer() later in flush_descriptor(). Reported-by: Harish Sriram <harish@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11ext4: remove unnecessary error checkShi Siyuan1-2/+0
Remove unnecessary error check in ext4_file_write_iter(), because this check will be done in upcoming later function -- ext4_write_checks() -> generic_write_checks() Change-Id: I7b0ab27f693a50765c15b5eaa3f4e7c38f42e01e Signed-off-by: shisiyuan <shisiyuan@xiaomi.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11ext4: fix warning when turn on dioread_nolock and inline_datayangerkun1-9/+9
mkfs.ext4 -O inline_data /dev/vdb mount -o dioread_nolock /dev/vdb /mnt echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file echo "some inline data..." >> /mnt/test-file sync The above script will trigger "WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal)" because ext4_should_dioread_nolock() returns false for a file with inline data. Move the check to a place after we have already removed the inline data and prepared inode to write normal pages. Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
2019-08-11Linux 5.3-rc4Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
2019-08-10Makefile: Convert -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 to just -Wimplicit-fallthrough for clangJoe Perches2-2/+2
A compilation -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was enabled by commit a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") Even though clang 10.0.0 does not currently support this warning without a patch, clang currently does not support a value for this option. Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39382 The gcc default for this warning is 3 so removing the =3 has no effect for gcc and enables the warning for patched versions of clang. Also remove the =3 from an existing use in a parisc Makefile: arch/parisc/math-emu/Makefile Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-08-09ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm): arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do': arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: ^~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09scsi: fas216: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+8
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Fix the following warnings (Building: rpc_defconfig arm): drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_disconnect_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:913:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (fas216_get_last_msg(info, info->scsi.msgin_fifo) == ABORT) { ^ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:919:2: note: here default: /* huh? */ ^~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_kick’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1959:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_allocate_tag(info, SCpnt); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1960:2: note: here case TYPE_OTHER: ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_busservice_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1413:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_stoptransfer(info); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1414:2: note: here case STATE(STAT_STATUS, PHASE_SELSTEPS):/* Sel w/ steps -> Status */ ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1424:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] fas216_stoptransfer(info); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1425:2: note: here case STATE(STAT_MESGIN, PHASE_COMMAND): /* Command -> Message In */ ^~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_funcdone_intr’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1573:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((stat & STAT_BUSMASK) == STAT_MESGIN) { ^ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:1579:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c: In function ‘fas216_handlesync’: drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:605:20: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] info->scsi.phase = PHASE_MSGOUT_EXPECT; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c:607:2: note: here case async: ^~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09pcmcia: db1xxx_ss: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+4
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: db1xxx_defconfig mips): drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:257:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/pcmcia/db1xxx_ss.c:269:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09video: fbdev: omapfb_main: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+8
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: omap1_defconfig arm): drivers/watchdog/wdt285.c:170:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c:237:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:449:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1549:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1547:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1545:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1543:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1540:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1538:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] drivers/video/fbdev/omap/omapfb_main.c:1535:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: riowd: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: sparc64): drivers/watchdog/riowd.c: In function ‘riowd_ioctl’: drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:136:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] riowd_writereg(p, riowd_timeout, WDTO_INDEX); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/riowd.c:139:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09s390/net: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva3-1/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings (Building: s390): drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c: In function ‘ctcmpc_chx_attnbusy’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1703:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (grp->changed_side == 1) { ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c:1707:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIX: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘ctc_mpc_alloc_channel’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:358:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (callback) ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:360:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_XID0IOWAIT: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_action_timeout’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1469:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((fsm_getstate(rch->fsm) == CH_XID0_PENDING) && ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:1472:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c: In function ‘mpc_send_qllc_discontact’: drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2087:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (grp->estconnfunc) { ^ drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c:2092:2: note: here case MPCG_STATE_FLOWC: ^~~~ drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c: In function ‘qeth_l2_process_inbound_buffer’: drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:328:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (IS_OSN(card)) { ^ drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_main.c:337:3: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09crypto: ux500/crypt: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+6
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_save_device_context’: drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:316:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_4_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_4_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:318:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192: ^~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:320:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_3_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_3_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:322:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128: ^~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:324:16: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] ctx->key_2_r = readl_relaxed(&src_reg->key_2_r); drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:326:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c: In function ‘cryp_restore_device_context’: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:363:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_4_r, &reg->key_4_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:365:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_192: ^~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:367:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_3_r, &reg->key_3_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:369:2: note: here case CRYP_KEY_SIZE_128: ^~~~ In file included from ./include/linux/io.h:13:0, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp_p.h:14, from drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:15: ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:92:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] #define __raw_writel __raw_writel ^ ./arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:299:29: note: in expansion of macro ‘__raw_writel’ #define writel_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c) ^~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:371:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘writel_relaxed’ writel_relaxed(ctx->key_2_r, &reg->key_2_r); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/crypto/ux500/cryp/cryp.c:373:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: wdt977: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm): drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c: In function ‘wdt977_ioctl’: LD [M] drivers/media/platform/vicodec/vicodec.o drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:400:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] wdt977_keepalive(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/wdt977.c:403:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: scx200_wdt: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning (Building: i386): drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c: In function ‘scx200_wdt_ioctl’: drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:188:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] scx200_wdt_ping(); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/watchdog/scx200_wdt.c:189:2: note: here case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: ^~~~ Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09watchdog: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva4-2/+4
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/watchdog/ar7_wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 237:3 drivers/watchdog/pcwd.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 653:3 drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 204:3 drivers/watchdog/wdt.c: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]: => 391:3 Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: signal: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: arch/arm/kernel/signal.c: In function 'do_signal': arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:598:12: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] restart -= 2; ~~~~~~~~^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/signal.c:599:3: note: here case -ERESTARTNOHAND: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mfd: omap-usb-host: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-2/+2
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_resume': drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:303:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i])) { ^ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:313:3: note: here case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL: ^~~~ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c: In function 'usbhs_runtime_suspend': drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:345:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (!IS_ERR(omap->hsic480m_clk[i])) ^ drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c:349:3: note: here case OMAP_EHCI_PORT_MODE_TLL: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mfd: db8500-prcmu: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+2
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c: In function 'dsiclk_rate': drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1592:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] div *= 2; ~~~~^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1593:2: note: here case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI_2: ^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1594:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] div *= 2; ~~~~^~~~ drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c:1595:2: note: here case PRCM_DSI_PLLOUT_SEL_PHI: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: OMAP: dma: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-9/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_src_burst_mode': arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:384:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:393:2: note: here case OMAP_DMA_DATA_BURST_16: ^~~~ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:394:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:402:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c: In function 'omap_set_dma_dest_burst_mode': arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:473:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dma_omap2plus()) { ^ arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c:481:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: alignment: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+3
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'thumb2arm': arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:688:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((tinstr & (3 << 9)) == 0x0400) { ^ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:700:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c: In function 'do_alignment_t32_to_handler': arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:753:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] poffset->un = (tinst2 & 0xff) << 2; ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:754:2: note: here case 0xe940: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM: tegra: Mark expected switch fall-throughGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warning: arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c: In function 'tegra_cpu_reset_handler_enable': arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:72:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] tegra_cpu_reset_handler_set(reset_address); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-tegra/reset.c:74:2: note: here case 0: ^~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09ARM/hw_breakpoint: Mark expected switch fall-throughsGustavo A. R. Silva1-0/+5
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_arch_parse': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:609:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_2) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:611:2: note: here case 3: ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:613:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (hw->ctrl.len == ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:615:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'arch_build_bp_info': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:544:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if ((hw->ctrl.type != ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:547:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/list.h:9, from include/linux/preempt.h:11, from include/linux/hardirq.h:5, from arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:16: arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'hw_breakpoint_pending': include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro 'unlikely' unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \ ^~~~~~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:863:3: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN' WARN(1, "Asynchronous watchpoint exception taken. Debugging results may be unreliable\n"); ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:864:2: note: here case ARM_ENTRY_SYNC_WATCHPOINT: ^~~~ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c: In function 'core_has_os_save_restore': arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:910:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (oslsr & ARM_OSLSR_OSLM0) ^ arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:912:2: note: here default: ^~~~~~~ Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
2019-08-09mm/memremap: Fix reuse of pgmap instances with internal referencesDan Williams1-0/+6
Currently, attempts to shutdown and re-enable a device-dax instance trigger: Missing reference count teardown definition WARNING: CPU: 37 PID: 1608 at mm/memremap.c:211 devm_memremap_pages+0x234/0x850 [..] RIP: 0010:devm_memremap_pages+0x234/0x850 [..] Call Trace: dev_dax_probe+0x66/0x190 [device_dax] really_probe+0xef/0x390 driver_probe_device+0xb4/0x100 device_driver_attach+0x4f/0x60 Given that the setup path initializes pgmap->ref, arrange for it to be also torn down so devm_memremap_pages() is ready to be called again and not be mistaken for the 3rd-party per-cpu-ref case. Fixes: 24917f6b1041 ("memremap: provide an optional internal refcount in struct dev_pagemap") Reported-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com> Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/156530042781.2068700.8733813683117819799.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2019-08-09drm/i915: Remove redundant user_access_end() from __copy_from_user() error pathJosh Poimboeuf1-11/+9
Objtool reports: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable __copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/51a4155c5bc2ca847a9cbe85c1c11918bb193141.1564086017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
2019-08-10kbuild: show hint if subdir-y/m is used to visit module MakefileMasahiro Yamada2-1/+8
Since commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod"), a module is no longer built in the following pattern: [Makefile] subdir-y := some-module [some-module/Makefile] obj-m := some-module.o You cannot write Makefile this way in upstream because modules.order is not correctly generated. subdir-y is used to descend to a sub-directory that builds tools, device trees, etc. For external modules, the modules order does not matter. So, the Makefile above was known to work. I believe the Makefile should be re-written as follows: [Makefile] obj-m := some-module/ [some-module/Makefile] obj-m := some-module.o However, people will have no idea if their Makefile suddenly stops working. In fact, I received questions from multiple people. Show a warning for a while if obj-m is specified in a Makefile visited by subdir-y or subdir-m. I touched the %/ rule to avoid false-positive warnings for the single target. Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Cc: Tom Stonecypher <thomas.edwardx.stonecypher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Tested-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: generate modules.order only in directories visited by obj-y/mMasahiro Yamada1-1/+2
The modules.order files in directories visited by the chain of obj-y or obj-m are merged to the upper-level ones, and become parts of the top-level modules.order. On the other hand, there is no need to generate modules.order in directories visited by subdir-y or subdir-m since they would become orphan anyway. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: fix false-positive need-builtin calculationMasahiro Yamada1-1/+2
The current implementation of need-builtin is false-positive, for example, in the following Makefile: obj-m := foo/ obj-y := foo/bar/ ..., where foo/built-in.a is not required. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-10kbuild: revive single target %.koMasahiro Yamada2-4/+13
I removed the single target %.ko in commit ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod") because the modpost stage does not work reliably. For instance, the module dependency, modversion, etc. do not work if we lack symbol information from the other modules. Yet, some people still want to build only one module in their interest, and it may be still useful if it is used within those limitations. Fixes: ff9b45c55b26 ("kbuild: modpost: read modules.order instead of $(MODVERDIR)/*.mod") Reported-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microsemi.com> Reported-by: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
2019-08-09gfs2: gfs2_walk_metadata fixAndreas Gruenbacher1-63/+101
It turns out that the current version of gfs2_metadata_walker suffers from multiple problems that can cause gfs2_hole_size to report an incorrect size. This will confuse fiemap as well as lseek with the SEEK_DATA flag. Fix that by changing gfs2_hole_walker to compute the metapath to the first data block after the hole (if any), and compute the hole size based on that. Fixes xfstest generic/490. Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18+