aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py (unfollow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_{SVE,SME,SME2,FA64}Mark Rutland2-6/+6
In system_supports_{sve,sme,sme2,fa64}() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for the relevant cpucaps, but this is only necessary so that sve_setup() and sme_setup() can run prior to alternatives being patched, and otherwise alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. All of system_supports_{sve,sme,sme2,fa64}() will return false prior to system cpucaps being detected. In the window between system cpucaps being detected and patching alternatives, we need system_supports_sve() and system_supports_sme() to run to initialize SVE and SME properties, but all other users of system_supports_{sve,sme,sme2,fa64}() don't depend on the relevant cpucap becoming true until alternatives are patched: * No KVM code runs until after alternatives are patched, and so this can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * The cpuid_cpu_online() callback in arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c is registered later from cpuinfo_regs_init() as a device_initcall, and so this can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * The entry, signal, and ptrace code isn't reachable until userspace has run, and so this can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * Currently perf_reg_validate() will un-reserve the PERF_REG_ARM64_VG pseudo-register before alternatives are patched, and before sve_setup() has run. If a sampling event is created early enough, this would allow perf_ext_reg_value() to sample (the as-yet uninitialized) thread_struct::vl[] prior to alternatives being patched. It would be preferable to defer this until alternatives are patched, and this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). * The context-switch code will run during this window as part of stop_machine() used during alternatives_patch_all(), and potentially for other work if other kernel threads are created early. No threads require the use of SVE/SME/SME2/FA64 prior to alternatives being patched, and it would be preferable for the related context-switch logic to take effect after alternatives are patched so that ths is guaranteed to see a consistent system-wide state (e.g. anything initialized by sve_setup() and sme_setup(). This can safely ues alternative_has_cap_*(). This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. The sve_setup() and sme_setup() functions are modified to use cpus_have_cap() directly so that they can observe the cpucaps being set prior to alternatives being patched. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_SPECTRE_V2Mark Rutland1-1/+1
In arm64_apply_bp_hardening() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_SPECTRE_V2 , but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The cpus_have_const_cap() check in arm64_apply_bp_hardening() is intended to avoid the overhead of looking up and invoking a per-cpu function pointer when no branch predictor hardening is required. The arm64_apply_bp_hardening() function itself is called in two distinct flows: 1) When handling certain exceptions taken from EL0, where the PC could be a TTBR1 address and hence might have trained a branch predictor. As cpucaps are detected and alternatives are patched long before it is possible to execute userspace, it is not necessary to use cpus_have_const_cap() for these cases, and cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap() would be preferable. 2) When switching between tasks in check_and_switch_context(). This can be called before cpucaps are detected and alternatives are patched, but this is long before the kernel mounts filesystems or accepts any input. At this stage the kernel hasn't loaded any secrets and there is no potential for hostile branch predictor training. Once cpucaps have been finalized and alternatives have been patched, switching tasks will invalidate any prior predictions. Hence it is not necessary to use cpus_have_const_cap() for this case. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_SSBSMark Rutland1-1/+1
In ssbs_thread_switch() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_SSBS, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The cpus_have_const_cap() check in ssbs_thread_switch() is an optimization to avoid the overhead of spectre_v4_enable_task_mitigation() where all CPUs implement SSBS and naturally preserve the SSBS bit in SPSR_ELx. In the window between detecting the ARM64_SSBS system-wide and patching alternative branches it is benign to continue to call spectre_v4_enable_task_mitigation(). This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_MTEMark Rutland1-1/+1
In system_supports_mte() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_MTE, but this is not necessary and cpus_have_final_boot_cap() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The ARM64_MTE cpucap is a boot cpu feature which is detected and patched early on the boot CPU under smp_prepare_boot_cpu(). In the window between detecting the ARM64_MTE cpucap and patching alternatives, nothing depends on the ARM64_MTE cpucap: * The kasan_hw_tags_enabled() helper depends upon the kasan_flag_enabled static key, which is initialized later in kasan_init_hw_tags() after alternatives have been applied. * No KVM code is called during this window, and KVM is not initialized until after system cpucaps have been detected and patched. KVM code can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * We don't context-switch prior to patching boot alternatives, and thus mte_thread_switch() is not reachable during this window. Thus, we can safely use cpus_have_final_boot_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*() in the context-switch code. * IRQ and FIQ are masked during this window, and we can only take SError and Debug exceptions. SError exceptions are fatal at this point in time, and we do not expect to take Debug exceptions, thus: - It's fine to lave TCO set for exceptions taken during this window, and mte_disable_tco_entry() doesn't need to do anything. - We don't need to detect and report asynchronous tag cehck faults during this window, and neither mte_check_tfsr_entry() nor mte_check_tfsr_exit() need to do anything. Since we want to report any SErrors taken during thiw window, these cannot safely use cpus_have_final_boot_cap() or cpus_have_final_cap(), but these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). * The __set_pte_at() function is not used during this window. It is possible for this to be used on kernel mappings prior to boot cpucaps being finalized, so this cannot safely use cpus_have_final_boot_cap() or cpus_have_final_cap(), but this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). * No userspace translation tables have been created yet, and swap has not been initialized yet. Thus swapping is not possible and none of the following are called: - arch_thp_swp_supported() - arch_prepare_to_swap() - arch_swap_invalidate_page() - arch_swap_invalidate_area() - arch_swap_restore() These can safely use system_has_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * The elfcore functions are only reachable after userspace is brought up, which happens after system cpucaps have been detected and patched. Thus the elfcore code can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * Hibernation is only possible after userspace is brought up, which happens after system cpucaps have been detected and patched. Thus the hibernate code can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * The set_tagged_addr_ctrl() function is only reachable after userspace is brought up, which happens after system cpucaps have been detected and patched. Thus this can safely use cpus_have_final_cap() or alternative_has_cap_*(). * The copy_user_highpage() and copy_highpage() functions are not used during this window, and can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGEMark Rutland1-1/+1
We use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. In the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE cpucap and patching alternative branches, we do not perform any TLB invalidation, and even if we were to perform TLB invalidation here it would not be functionally necessary to optimize this by using range invalidation. Hence there's no need to use cpus_have_const_cap(), and alternative_has_cap_unlikely() is sufficient. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_WFXTMark Rutland1-1/+1
In __delay() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_WFXT, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The cpus_have_const_cap() check in __delay() is an optimization to use WFIT and WFET in preference to busy-polling the counter and/or using regular WFE and relying upon the architected timer event stream. It is not necessary to apply this optimization in the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_WFXT cpucap and patching alternatives. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_RNGMark Rutland1-1/+1
In __cpu_has_rng() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_RNG, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. In the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_RNG cpucap and patching alternative branches, nothing which calls __cpu_has_rng() can run, and hence it's not necessary to use cpus_have_const_cap(). This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_EPANMark Rutland3-2/+4
We use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_EPAN but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap() or cpus_have_cap() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The ARM64_HAS_EPAN cpucap is used to affect two things: 1) The permision bits used for userspace executable mappings, which are chosen by adjust_protection_map(), which is an arch_initcall. This is called after the ARM64_HAS_EPAN cpucap has been detected and alternatives have been patched, and before any userspace translation tables exist. 2) The handling of faults taken from (user or kernel) accesses to userspace executable mappings in do_page_fault(). Userspace translation tables are created after adjust_protection_map() is called, and hence after the ARM64_HAS_EPAN cpucap has been detected and alternatives have been patched. Neither of these run until after ARM64_HAS_EPAN cpucap has been detected and alternatives have been patched, and hence there's no need to use cpus_have_const_cap(). Since adjust_protection_map() is only executed once at boot time it would be best for it to use cpus_have_cap(), and since do_page_fault() is executed frequently it would be best for it to use alternatives_have_cap_unlikely(). This patch replaces the uses of cpus_have_const_cap() with cpus_have_cap() and alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating redundant code, and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. The ARM64_HAS_EPAN cpucap is added to cpucap_is_possible() so that code can be elided entirely when this is not possible. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_PANMark Rutland2-2/+3
In system_uses_hw_pan() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_PAN, but this is only necessary so that the system_uses_ttbr0_pan() check in setup_cpu_features() can run prior to alternatives being patched, and otherwise this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The ARM64_HAS_PAN cpucap is used by system_uses_hw_pan() and system_uses_ttbr0_pan() depending on whether CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN is selected, and: * We only use system_uses_hw_pan() directly in __sdei_handler(), which isn't reachable until after alternatives have been patched, and for this it is safe to use alternative_has_cap_*(). * We use system_uses_ttbr0_pan() in a few places: - In check_and_switch_context() and cpu_uninstall_idmap(), which will defer installing a translation table into TTBR0 when the ARM64_HAS_PAN cpucap is not detected. Prior to patching alternatives, all CPUs will be using init_mm with the reserved ttbr0 translation tables install in TTBR0, so these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). - In update_saved_ttbr0(), which will only save the active TTBR0 into a per-thread variable when the ARM64_HAS_PAN cpucap is not detected. Prior to patching alternatives, all CPUs will be using init_mm with the reserved ttbr0 translation tables install in TTBR0, so these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*(). - In efi_set_pgd(), which will handle check_and_switch_context() deferring the installation of TTBR0 when TTBR0 PAN is detected. The EFI runtime services are not initialized until after alternatives have been patched, and so this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). - In uaccess_ttbr0_disable() and uaccess_ttbr0_enable(), where we'll avoid installing/uninstalling a translation table in TTBR0 when ARM64_HAS_PAN is detected. Prior to patching alternatives we will not perform any uaccess and will not call uaccess_ttbr0_disable() or uaccess_ttbr0_enable(), and so these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). - In is_el1_permission_fault() where we will consider a translation fault on a TTBR0 address to be a permission fault when ARM64_HAS_PAN is not detected *and* we have set the PAN bit in the SPSR (which tells us that in the interrupted context, TTBR0 pointed at the reserved zero ttbr). In the window between detecting system cpucaps and patching alternatives we should not perform any accesses to TTBR0 addresses, and no userspace translation tables exist until after patching alternatives. Thus it is safe for this to use alternative_has_cap*(). This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. So that the check for TTBR0 PAN in setup_cpu_features() can run prior to alternatives being patched, the call to system_uses_ttbr0_pan() is replaced with an explicit check of the ARM64_HAS_PAN bit in the system_cpucaps bitmap. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKINGMark Rutland2-14/+8
In system_uses_irq_prio_masking() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. When CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI=y the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap is a strict boot cpu feature which is detected and patched early on the boot cpu, which both happen in smp_prepare_boot_cpu(). In the window between the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap is detected and alternatives are patched we don't run any code that depends upon the ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING cpucap: * We leave DAIF.IF set until after boot alternatives are patched, and interrupts are unmasked later in init_IRQ(), so we cannot reach IRQ/FIQ entry code and will not use irqs_priority_unmasked(). * We don't call any code which uses arm_cpuidle_save_irq_context() and arm_cpuidle_restore_irq_context() during this window. * We don't call start_thread_common() during this window. * The local_irq_*() code in <asm/irqflags.h> depends solely on an alternative branch since commit: a5f61cc636f48bdf ("arm64: irqflags: use alternative branches for pseudo-NMI logic") ... and hence will use the default (DAIF-only) masking behaviour until alternatives are patched. * Secondary CPUs are brought up later after alternatives are patched, and alternatives are patched on the boot CPU immediately prior to calling init_gic_priority_masking(), so we'll correctly initialize interrupt masking regardless. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. As this makes system_uses_irq_prio_masking() equivalent to __irqflags_uses_pmr(), the latter is removed and replaced with the former for consistency. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_DITMark Rutland1-1/+10
In __cpu_suspend_exit() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_DIT but this is not necessary and cpus_have_final_cap() of alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The ARM64_HAS_DIT cpucap is detected and patched (along with all other cpucaps) before __cpu_suspend_exit() can run. We'll only use __cpu_suspend_exit() as part of PSCI cpuidle or hibernation, and both of these are intialized after system cpucaps are detected and patched: the PSCI cpuidle driver is registered with a device_initcall, hibernation restoration occurs in a late_initcall, and hibarnation saving is driven by usrspace. Therefore it is not necessary to use cpus_have_const_cap(), and using alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap() is sufficient. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. To clearly document the ordering relationship between suspend/resume and alternatives patching, an explicit check for system_capabilities_finalized() is added to cpu_suspend() along with a comment block, which will make it easier to spot issues if code is changed in future to allow these functions to be reached earlier. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_CNPMark Rutland4-14/+20
In system_supports_cnp() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_CNP, but this is only necessary so that the cpu_enable_cnp() callback can run prior to alternatives being patched, and otherwise this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The cpu_enable_cnp() callback is run immediately after the ARM64_HAS_CNP cpucap is detected system-wide under setup_system_capabilities(), prior to alternatives being patched. During this window cpu_enable_cnp() uses cpu_replace_ttbr1() to set the CNP bit for the swapper_pg_dir in TTBR1. No other users of the ARM64_HAS_CNP cpucap need the up-to-date value during this window: * As KVM isn't initialized yet, kvm_get_vttbr() isn't reachable. * As cpuidle isn't initialized yet, __cpu_suspend_exit() isn't reachable. * At this point all CPUs are using the swapper_pg_dir with a reserved ASID in TTBR1, and the idmap_pg_dir in TTBR0, so neither check_and_switch_context() nor cpu_do_switch_mm() need to do anything special. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. To allow cpu_enable_cnp() to function prior to alternatives being patched, cpu_replace_ttbr1() is split into cpu_replace_ttbr1() and cpu_enable_swapper_cnp(), with the former only used for early TTBR1 replacement, and the latter used by both cpu_enable_cnp() and __cpu_suspend_exit(). Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DICMark Rutland1-1/+1
In icache_inval_all_pou() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The cpus_have_const_cap() check in icache_inval_all_pou() is an optimization to skip a redundant (but benign) IC IALLUIS + DSB ISH sequence when all CPUs in the system have DIC. In the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC cpucap and patching alternative branches there is only a single potential call to icache_inval_all_pou() (in the alternatives patching itself), which there's no need to optimize for at the expense of other callers. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. This also aligns better with the way we patch the assembly cache maintenance sequences in arch/arm64/mm/cache.S. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_BTIMark Rutland5-10/+11
In system_supports_bti() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_BTI, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_*cap() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. When CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL=y, the ARM64_HAS_BTI cpucap is a strict boot cpu feature which is detected and patched early on the boot cpu. All uses guarded by CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL happen after the boot CPU has detected ARM64_HAS_BTI and patched boot alternatives, and hence can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_boot_cap(). Regardless of CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL, all other uses of ARM64_HAS_BTI happen after system capabilities have been finalized and alternatives have been patched. Hence these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*) or cpus_have_final_cap(). This patch splits system_supports_bti() into system_supports_bti() and system_supports_bti_kernel(), with the former handling where the cpucap affects userspace functionality, and ther latter handling where the cpucap affects kernel functionality. The use of cpus_have_const_cap() is replaced by cpus_have_final_cap() in cpus_have_const_cap, and cpus_have_final_boot_cap() in system_supports_bti_kernel(). This will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. The use of cpus_have_final_cap() and cpus_have_final_boot_cap() will make it easier to spot if code is chaanged such that these run before the ARM64_HAS_BTI cpucap is guaranteed to have been finalized. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTLMark Rutland1-1/+1
In __tlbi_level() we use cpus_have_const_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would be preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. In the window between detecting the ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL cpucap and patching alternative branches, we do not perform any TLB invalidation, and even if we were to perform TLB invalidation here it would not be functionally necessary to optimize this by using the TTL hint. Hence there's no need to use cpus_have_const_cap(), and alternative_has_cap_unlikely() is sufficient. This patch replaces the use of cpus_have_const_cap() with alternative_has_cap_unlikely(), which will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Avoid cpus_have_const_cap() for ARM64_HAS_{ADDRESS,GENERIC}_AUTHMark Rutland1-2/+2
In system_supports_address_auth() and system_supports_generic_auth() we use cpus_have_const_cap to check for ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH and ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH respectively, but this is not necessary and alternative_has_cap_*() would bre preferable. For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. The ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH cpucap is a boot cpu feature which is detected and patched early on the boot CPU before any pointer authentication keys are enabled via their respective SCTLR_ELx.EN* bits. Nothing which uses system_supports_address_auth() is called before the boot alternatives are patched. Thus it is safe for system_supports_address_auth() to use cpus_have_final_boot_cap() to check for ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH. The ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH cpucap is a system feature which is detected on all CPUs, then finalized and patched under setup_system_capabilities(). We use system_supports_generic_auth() in a few places: * The pac_generic_keys_get() and pac_generic_keys_set() functions are only reachable from system calls once userspace is up and running. As cpucaps are finalzied long before userspace runs, these can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). * The ptrauth_prctl_reset_keys() function is only reachable from system calls once userspace is up and running. As cpucaps are finalized long before userspace runs, this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). * The ptrauth_keys_install_user() function is used during context-switch. This is called prior to alternatives being applied, and so cannot use cpus_have_final_cap(), but as this only needs to switch the APGA key for userspace tasks, it's safe to use alternative_has_cap_*(). * The ptrauth_keys_init_user() function is used to initialize userspace keys, and is only reachable after system cpucaps have been finalized and patched. Thus this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). * The system_has_full_ptr_auth() helper function is only used by KVM code, which is only reachable after system cpucaps have been finalized and patched. Thus this can safely use alternative_has_cap_*() or cpus_have_final_cap(). This patch modifies system_supports_address_auth() to use cpus_have_final_boot_cap() to check ARM64_HAS_ADDRESS_AUTH, and modifies system_supports_generic_auth() to use alternative_has_cap_unlikely() to check ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH. In either case this will avoid generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap and should be better for all subsequent calls at runtime. The use of cpus_have_final_boot_cap() will make it easier to spot if code is chaanged such that these run before the relevant cpucap is guaranteed to have been finalized. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Use a positive cpucap for FP/SIMDMark Rutland6-26/+44
Currently we have a negative cpucap which describes the *absence* of FP/SIMD rather than *presence* of FP/SIMD. This largely works, but is somewhat awkward relative to other cpucaps that describe the presence of a feature, and it would be nicer to have a cpucap which describes the presence of FP/SIMD: * This will allow the cpucap to be treated as a standard ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE, which can be detected with the standard has_cpuid_feature() function and ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS() description. * This ensures that the cpucap will only transition from not-present to present, reducing the risk of unintentional and/or unsafe usage of FP/SIMD before cpucaps are finalized. * This will allow using arm64_cpu_capabilities::cpu_enable() to enable the use of FP/SIMD later, with FP/SIMD being disabled at boot time otherwise. This will ensure that any unintentional and/or unsafe usage of FP/SIMD prior to this is trapped, and will ensure that FP/SIMD is never unintentionally enabled for userspace in mismatched big.LITTLE systems. This patch replaces the negative ARM64_HAS_NO_FPSIMD cpucap with a positive ARM64_HAS_FPSIMD cpucap, making changes as described above. Note that as FP/SIMD will now be trapped when not supported system-wide, do_fpsimd_acc() must handle these traps in the same way as for SVE and SME. The commentary in fpsimd_restore_current_state() is updated to describe the new scheme. No users of system_supports_fpsimd() need to know that FP/SIMD is available prior to alternatives being patched, so this is updated to use alternative_has_cap_likely() to check for the ARM64_HAS_FPSIMD cpucap, without generating code to test the system_cpucaps bitmap. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Rename SVE/SME cpu_enable functionsMark Rutland3-16/+12
The arm64_cpu_capabilities::cpu_enable() callbacks for SVE, SME, SME2, and FA64 are named with an unusual "${feature}_kernel_enable" pattern rather than the much more common "cpu_enable_${feature}". Now that we only use these as cpu_enable() callbacks, it would be nice to have them match the usual scheme. This patch renames the cpu_enable() callbacks to match this scheme. At the same time, the comment above cpu_enable_sve() is removed for consistency with the other cpu_enable() callbacks. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Use build-time assertions for cpucap orderingMark Rutland1-8/+6
Both sme2_kernel_enable() and fa64_kernel_enable() need to run after sme_kernel_enable(). This happens to be true today as ARM64_SME has a lower index than either ARM64_SME2 or ARM64_SME_FA64, and both functions have a comment to this effect. It would be nicer to have a build-time assertion like we for for can_use_gic_priorities() and has_gic_prio_relaxed_sync(), as that way it will be harder to miss any potential breakage. This patch replaces the comments with build-time assertions. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Explicitly save/restore CPACR when probing SVE and SMEMark Rutland3-7/+50
When a CPUs onlined we first probe for supported features and propetites, and then we subsequently enable features that have been detected. This is a little problematic for SVE and SME, as some properties (e.g. vector lengths) cannot be probed while they are disabled. Due to this, the code probing for SVE properties has to enable SVE for EL1 prior to proving, and the code probing for SME properties has to enable SME for EL1 prior to probing. We never disable SVE or SME for EL1 after probing. It would be a little nicer to transiently enable SVE and SME during probing, leaving them both disabled unless explicitly enabled, as this would make it much easier to catch unintentional usage (e.g. when they are not present system-wide). This patch reworks the SVE and SME feature probing code to only transiently enable support at EL1, disabling after probing is complete. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: kvm: Use cpus_have_final_cap() explicitlyMark Rutland9-15/+15
Much of the arm64 KVM code uses cpus_have_const_cap() to check for cpucaps, but this is unnecessary and it would be preferable to use cpus_have_final_cap(). For historical reasons, cpus_have_const_cap() is more complicated than it needs to be. Before cpucaps are finalized, it will perform a bitmap test of the system_cpucaps bitmap, and once cpucaps are finalized it will use an alternative branch. This used to be necessary to handle some race conditions in the window between cpucap detection and the subsequent patching of alternatives and static branches, where different branches could be out-of-sync with one another (or w.r.t. alternative sequences). Now that we use alternative branches instead of static branches, these are all patched atomically w.r.t. one another, and there are only a handful of cases that need special care in the window between cpucap detection and alternative patching. Due to the above, it would be nice to remove cpus_have_const_cap(), and migrate callers over to alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_final_cap(), or cpus_have_cap() depending on when their requirements. This will remove redundant instructions and improve code generation, and will make it easier to determine how each callsite will behave before, during, and after alternative patching. KVM is initialized after cpucaps have been finalized and alternatives have been patched. Since commit: d86de40decaa14e6 ("arm64: cpufeature: upgrade hyp caps to final") ... use of cpus_have_const_cap() in hyp code is automatically converted to use cpus_have_final_cap(): | static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) | { | if (is_hyp_code()) | return cpus_have_final_cap(num); | else if (system_capabilities_finalized()) | return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); | else | return cpus_have_cap(num); | } Thus, converting hyp code to use cpus_have_final_cap() directly will not result in any functional change. Non-hyp KVM code is also not executed until cpucaps have been finalized, and it would be preferable to extent the same treatment to this code and use cpus_have_final_cap() directly. This patch converts instances of cpus_have_const_cap() in KVM-only code over to cpus_have_final_cap(). As all of this code runs after cpucaps have been finalized, there should be no functional change as a result of this patch, but the redundant instructions generated by cpus_have_const_cap() will be removed from the non-hyp KVM code. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Split kpti_install_ng_mappings()Mark Rutland1-21/+33
The arm64_cpu_capabilities::cpu_enable callbacks are intended for cpu-local feature enablement (e.g. poking system registers). These get called for each online CPU when boot/system cpucaps get finalized and enabled, and get called whenever a CPU is subsequently onlined. For KPTI with the ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 cpucap, we use the kpti_install_ng_mappings() function as the cpu_enable callback. This does a mixture of cpu-local configuration (setting VBAR_EL1 to the appropriate trampoline vectors) and some global configuration (rewriting the swapper page tables to sue non-glboal mappings) that must happen at most once. This patch splits kpti_install_ng_mappings() into a cpu-local cpu_enable_kpti() initialization function and a system-wide kpti_install_ng_mappings() function. The cpu_enable_kpti() function is responsible for selecting the necessary cpu-local vectors each time a CPU is onlined, and the kpti_install_ng_mappings() function performs the one-time rewrite of the translation tables too use non-global mappings. Splitting the two makes the code a bit easier to follow and also allows the page table rewriting code to be marked as __init such that it can be freed after use. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Fixup user features at boot timeMark Rutland3-17/+15
For ARM64_WORKAROUND_2658417, we use a cpu_enable() callback to hide the ID_AA64ISAR1_EL1.BF16 ID register field. This is a little awkward as CPUs may attempt to apply the workaround concurrently, requiring that we protect the bulk of the callback with a raw_spinlock, and requiring some pointless work every time a CPU is subsequently hotplugged in. This patch makes this a little simpler by handling the masking once at boot time. A new user_feature_fixup() function is called at the start of setup_user_features() to mask the feature, matching the style of elf_hwcap_fixup(). The ARM64_WORKAROUND_2658417 cpucap is added to cpucap_is_possible() so that code can be elided entirely when this is not possible. Note that the ARM64_WORKAROUND_2658417 capability is matched with ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(), which implicitly gives the capability a ARM64_CPUCAP_LOCAL_CPU_ERRATUM type, which forbids the late onlining of a CPU with the erratum if the erratum was not present at boot time. Therefore this patch doesn't change the behaviour for late onlining. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Rework setup_cpu_features()Mark Rutland3-24/+26
Currently setup_cpu_features() handles a mixture of one-time kernel feature setup (e.g. cpucaps) and one-time user feature setup (e.g. ELF hwcaps). Subsequent patches will rework other one-time setup and expand the logic currently in setup_cpu_features(), and in preparation for this it would be helpful to split the kernel and user setup into separate functions. This patch splits setup_user_features() out of setup_cpu_features(), with a few additional cleanups of note: * setup_cpu_features() is renamed to setup_system_features() to make it clear that it handles system-wide feature setup rather than cpu-local feature setup. * setup_system_capabilities() is folded into setup_system_features(). * Presence of TTBR0 pan is logged immediately after update_cpu_capabilities(), so that this is guaranteed to appear alongside all the other detected system cpucaps. * The 'cwg' variable is removed as its value is only consumed once and it's simpler to use cache_type_cwg() directly without assigning its return value to a variable. * The call to setup_user_features() is moved after alternatives are patched, which will allow user feature setup code to depend on alternative branches and allow for simplifications in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Add cpus_have_final_boot_cap()Mark Rutland1-2/+25
The cpus_have_final_cap() function can be used to test a cpucap while also verifying that we do not consume the cpucap until system capabilities have been finalized. It would be helpful if we could do likewise for boot cpucaps. This patch adds a new cpus_have_final_boot_cap() helper which can be used to test a cpucap while also verifying that boot capabilities have been finalized. Users will be added in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Add cpucap_is_possible()Mark Rutland3-29/+59
Many cpucaps can only be set when certain CONFIG_* options are selected, and we need to check the CONFIG_* option before the cap in order to avoid generating redundant code. Due to this, we have a growing number of helpers in <asm/cpufeature.h> of the form: | static __always_inline bool system_supports_foo(void) | { | return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_FOO) && | cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_FOO); | } This is unfortunate as it forces us to use cpus_have_const_cap() unnecessarily, resulting in redundant code being generated by the compiler. In the vast majority of cases, we only require that feature checks indicate the presence of a feature after cpucaps have been finalized, and so it would be sufficient to use alternative_has_cap_*(). However some code needs to handle a feature before alternatives have been patched, and must test the system_cpucaps bitmap via cpus_have_const_cap(). In other cases we'd like to check for unintentional usage of a cpucap before alternatives are patched, and so it would be preferable to use cpus_have_final_cap(). Placing the IS_ENABLED() checks in each callsite is tedious and error-prone, and the same applies for writing wrappers for each comination of cpucap and alternative_has_cap_*() / cpus_have_cap() / cpus_have_final_cap(). It would be nicer if we could centralize the knowledge of which cpucaps are possible, and have alternative_has_cap_*(), cpus_have_cap(), and cpus_have_final_cap() handle this automatically. This patch adds a new cpucap_is_possible() function which will be responsible for checking the CONFIG_* option, and updates the low-level cpucap checks to use this. The existing CONFIG_* checks in <asm/cpufeature.h> are moved over to cpucap_is_possible(), but the (now trival) wrapper functions are retained for now. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch alone. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64: Factor out cpucap definitionsMark Rutland4-6/+14
For clarity it would be nice to factor cpucap manipulation out of <asm/cpufeature.h>, and the obvious place would be <asm/cpucap.h>, but this will clash somewhat with <generated/asm/cpucaps.h>. Rename <generated/asm/cpucaps.h> to <generated/asm/cpucap-defs.h>, matching what we do for <generated/asm/sysreg-defs.h>, and introduce a new <asm/cpucaps.h> which includes the generated header. Subsequent patches will fill out <asm/cpucaps.h>. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16arm64/arm: xen: enlighten: Fix KPTI checksMark Rutland2-9/+17
When KPTI is in use, we cannot register a runstate region as XEN requires that this is always a valid VA, which we cannot guarantee. Due to this, xen_starting_cpu() must avoid registering each CPU's runstate region, and xen_guest_init() must avoid setting up features that depend upon it. We tried to ensure that in commit: f88af7229f6f22ce (" xen/arm: do not setup the runstate info page if kpti is enabled") ... where we added checks for xen_kernel_unmapped_at_usr(), which wraps arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0() on arm64 and is always false on 32-bit arm. Unfortunately, as xen_guest_init() is an early_initcall, this happens before secondary CPUs are booted and arm64 has finalized the ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 cpucap which backs arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0(), and so this can subsequently be set as secondary CPUs are onlined. On a big.LITTLE system where the boot CPU does not require KPTI but some secondary CPUs do, this will result in xen_guest_init() intializing features that depend on the runstate region, and xen_starting_cpu() registering the runstate region on some CPUs before KPTI is subsequent enabled, resulting the the problems the aforementioned commit tried to avoid. Handle this more robsutly by deferring the initialization of the runstate region until secondary CPUs have been initialized and the ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 cpucap has been finalized. The per-cpu work is moved into a new hotplug starting function which is registered later when we're certain that KPTI will not be used. Fixes: f88af7229f6f ("xen/arm: do not setup the runstate info page if kpti is enabled") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@arm.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-10-16clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Initialize evtstrm after finalizing cpucapsMark Rutland2-5/+27
We attempt to initialize each CPU's arch_timer event stream in arch_timer_evtstrm_enable(), which we call from the arch_timer_starting_cpu() cpu hotplug callback which is registered early in boot. As this is registered before we initialize the system cpucaps, the test for ARM64_HAS_ECV will always be false for CPUs present at boot time, and will only be taken into account for CPUs onlined late (including those which are hotplugged out and in again). Due to this, CPUs present and boot time may not use the intended divider and scale factor to generate the event stream, and may differ from other CPUs. Correct this by only initializing the event stream after cpucaps have been finalized, registering a separate CPU hotplug callback for the event stream configuration. Since the caps must be finalized by this point, use cpus_have_final_cap() to verify this. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2023-09-24Linux 6.6-rc3Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
2023-09-23mfd: cs42l43: Use correct macro for new-style PM runtime opsCharles Keepax1-2/+2
The code was accidentally mixing new and old style macros, update the macros used to remove an unused function warning whilst building with no PM enabled in the config. Fixes: ace6d1448138 ("mfd: cs42l43: Add support for cs42l43 core driver") Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230822114914.340359-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com/ Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2023-09-23KVM: SVM: Do not use user return MSR support for virtualized TSC_AUXTom Lendacky1-1/+33
When the TSC_AUX MSR is virtualized, the TSC_AUX value is swap type "B" within the VMSA. This means that the guest value is loaded on VMRUN and the host value is restored from the host save area on #VMEXIT. Since the value is restored on #VMEXIT, the KVM user return MSR support for TSC_AUX can be replaced by populating the host save area with the current host value of TSC_AUX. And, since TSC_AUX is not changed by Linux post-boot, the host save area can be set once in svm_hardware_enable(). This eliminates the two WRMSR instructions associated with the user return MSR support. Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <d381de38eb0ab6c9c93dda8503b72b72546053d7.1694811272.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-23KVM: SVM: Fix TSC_AUX virtualization setupTom Lendacky3-12/+29
The checks for virtualizing TSC_AUX occur during the vCPU reset processing path. However, at the time of initial vCPU reset processing, when the vCPU is first created, not all of the guest CPUID information has been set. In this case the RDTSCP and RDPID feature support for the guest is not in place and so TSC_AUX virtualization is not established. This continues for each vCPU created for the guest. On the first boot of an AP, vCPU reset processing is executed as a result of an APIC INIT event, this time with all of the guest CPUID information set, resulting in TSC_AUX virtualization being enabled, but only for the APs. The BSP always sees a TSC_AUX value of 0 which probably went unnoticed because, at least for Linux, the BSP TSC_AUX value is 0. Move the TSC_AUX virtualization enablement out of the init_vmcb() path and into the vcpu_after_set_cpuid() path to allow for proper initialization of the support after the guest CPUID information has been set. With the TSC_AUX virtualization support now in the vcpu_set_after_cpuid() path, the intercepts must be either cleared or set based on the guest CPUID input. Fixes: 296d5a17e793 ("KVM: SEV-ES: Use V_TSC_AUX if available instead of RDTSC/MSR_TSC_AUX intercepts") Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Message-Id: <4137fbcb9008951ab5f0befa74a0399d2cce809a.1694811272.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-23KVM: SVM: INTERCEPT_RDTSCP is never intercepted anywayPaolo Bonzini1-4/+1
svm_recalc_instruction_intercepts() is always called at least once before the vCPU is started, so the setting or clearing of the RDTSCP intercept can be dropped from the TSC_AUX virtualization support. Extracted from a patch by Tom Lendacky. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 296d5a17e793 ("KVM: SEV-ES: Use V_TSC_AUX if available instead of RDTSC/MSR_TSC_AUX intercepts") Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-23KVM: x86/mmu: Stop zapping invalidated TDP MMU roots asynchronouslySean Christopherson6-103/+68
Stop zapping invalidate TDP MMU roots via work queue now that KVM preserves TDP MMU roots until they are explicitly invalidated. Zapping roots asynchronously was effectively a workaround to avoid stalling a vCPU for an extended during if a vCPU unloaded a root, which at the time happened whenever the guest toggled CR0.WP (a frequent operation for some guest kernels). While a clever hack, zapping roots via an unbound worker had subtle, unintended consequences on host scheduling, especially when zapping multiple roots, e.g. as part of a memslot. Because the work of zapping a root is no longer bound to the task that initiated the zap, things like the CPU affinity and priority of the original task get lost. Losing the affinity and priority can be especially problematic if unbound workqueues aren't affined to a small number of CPUs, as zapping multiple roots can cause KVM to heavily utilize the majority of CPUs in the system, *beyond* the CPUs KVM is already using to run vCPUs. When deleting a memslot via KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, the async root zap can result in KVM occupying all logical CPUs for ~8ms, and result in high priority tasks not being scheduled in in a timely manner. In v5.15, which doesn't preserve unloaded roots, the issues were even more noticeable as KVM would zap roots more frequently and could occupy all CPUs for 50ms+. Consuming all CPUs for an extended duration can lead to significant jitter throughout the system, e.g. on ChromeOS with virtio-gpu, deleting memslots is a semi-frequent operation as memslots are deleted and recreated with different host virtual addresses to react to host GPU drivers allocating and freeing GPU blobs. On ChromeOS, the jitter manifests as audio blips during games due to the audio server's tasks not getting scheduled in promptly, despite the tasks having a high realtime priority. Deleting memslots isn't exactly a fast path and should be avoided when possible, and ChromeOS is working towards utilizing MAP_FIXED to avoid the memslot shenanigans, but KVM is squarely in the wrong. Not to mention that removing the async zapping eliminates a non-trivial amount of complexity. Note, one of the subtle behaviors hidden behind the async zapping is that KVM would zap invalidated roots only once (ignoring partial zaps from things like mmu_notifier events). Preserve this behavior by adding a flag to identify roots that are scheduled to be zapped versus roots that have already been zapped but not yet freed. Add a comment calling out why kvm_tdp_mmu_invalidate_all_roots() can encounter invalid roots, as it's not at all obvious why zapping invalidated roots shouldn't simply zap all invalid roots. Reported-by: Pattara Teerapong <pteerapong@google.com> Cc: David Stevens <stevensd@google.com> Cc: Yiwei Zhang<zzyiwei@google.com> Cc: Paul Hsia <paulhsia@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20230916003916.2545000-4-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-23KVM: x86/mmu: Do not filter address spaces in for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe()Paolo Bonzini3-19/+14
All callers except the MMU notifier want to process all address spaces. Remove the address space ID argument of for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe() and switch the MMU notifier to use __for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(). Extracted out of a patch by Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-22cxl/acpi: Annotate struct cxl_cxims_data with __counted_byKees Cook1-2/+2
Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by for struct cxl_cxims_data. Additionally, since the element count member must be set before accessing the annotated flexible array member, move its initialization earlier. [1] https://github.com/kees/kernel-tools/blob/trunk/coccinelle/examples/counted_by.cocci Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922175319.work.096-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-09-22cxl/port: Fix cxl_test register enumeration regressionDan Williams1-4/+9
The cxl_test unit test environment models a CXL topology for sysfs/user-ABI regression testing. It uses interface mocking via the "--wrap=" linker option to redirect cxl_core routines that parse hardware registers with versions that just publish objects, like devm_cxl_enumerate_decoders(). Starting with: Commit 19ab69a60e3b ("cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port") ...port register enumeration is moved into devm_cxl_add_port(). This conflicts with the "cxl_test avoids emulating registers stance" so either the port code needs to be refactored (too violent), or modified so that register enumeration is skipped on "fake" cxl_test ports (annoying, but straightforward). This conflict has happened previously and the "check for platform device" workaround to avoid instrusive refactoring was deployed in those scenarios. In general, refactoring should only benefit production code, test code needs to remain minimally instrusive to the greatest extent possible. This was missed previously because it may sometimes just cause warning messages to be emitted, but it can also cause test failures. The backport to -stable is only nice to have for clean cxl_test runs. Fixes: 19ab69a60e3b ("cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Tested-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/169476525052.1013896.6235102957693675187.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-09-22eventfs: Remember what dentries were created on dir openSteven Rostedt (Google)1-17/+70
Using the following code with libtracefs: int dfd; // create the directory events/kprobes/kp1 tracefs_kprobe_raw(NULL, "kp1", "schedule_timeout", "time=$arg1"); // Open the kprobes directory dfd = tracefs_instance_file_open(NULL, "events/kprobes", O_RDONLY); // Do a lookup of the kprobes/kp1 directory (by looking at enable) tracefs_file_exists(NULL, "events/kprobes/kp1/enable"); // Now create a new entry in the kprobes directory tracefs_kprobe_raw(NULL, "kp2", "schedule_hrtimeout", "expires=$arg1"); // Do another lookup to create the dentries tracefs_file_exists(NULL, "events/kprobes/kp2/enable")) // Close the directory close(dfd); What happened above, the first open (dfd) will call dcache_dir_open_wrapper() that will create the dentries and up their ref counts. Now the creation of "kp2" will add another dentry within the kprobes directory. Upon the close of dfd, eventfs_release() will now do a dput for all the entries in kprobes. But this is where the problem lies. The open only upped the dentry of kp1 and not kp2. Now the close is decrementing both kp1 and kp2, which causes kp2 to get a negative count. Doing a "trace-cmd reset" which deletes all the kprobes cause the kernel to crash! (due to the messed up accounting of the ref counts). To solve this, save all the dentries that are opened in the dcache_dir_open_wrapper() into an array, and use this array to know what dentries to do a dput on in eventfs_release(). Since the dcache_dir_open_wrapper() calls dcache_dir_open() which uses the file->private_data, we need to also add a wrapper around dcache_readdir() that uses the cursor assigned to the file->private_data. This is because the dentries need to also be saved in the file->private_data. To do this create the structure: struct dentry_list { void *cursor; struct dentry **dentries; }; Which will hold both the cursor and the dentries. Some shuffling around is needed to make sure that dcache_dir_open() and dcache_readdir() only see the cursor. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230919211804.230edf1e@gandalf.local.home/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230922163446.1431d4fa@gandalf.local.home Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com> Fixes: 63940449555e7 ("eventfs: Implement eventfs lookup, read, open functions") Reported-by: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2023-09-22ring-buffer: Fix bytes info in per_cpu buffer statsZheng Yejian1-13/+15
The 'bytes' info in file 'per_cpu/cpu<X>/stats' means the number of bytes in cpu buffer that have not been consumed. However, currently after consuming data by reading file 'trace_pipe', the 'bytes' info was not changed as expected. # cat per_cpu/cpu0/stats entries: 0 overrun: 0 commit overrun: 0 bytes: 568 <--- 'bytes' is problematical !!! oldest event ts: 8651.371479 now ts: 8653.912224 dropped events: 0 read events: 8 The root cause is incorrect stat on cpu_buffer->read_bytes. To fix it: 1. When stat 'read_bytes', account consumed event in rb_advance_reader(); 2. When stat 'entries_bytes', exclude the discarded padding event which is smaller than minimum size because it is invisible to reader. Then use rb_page_commit() instead of BUF_PAGE_SIZE at where accounting for page-based read/remove/overrun. Also correct the comments of ring_buffer_bytes_cpu() in this patch. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230921125425.1708423-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c64e148a3be3 ("trace: Add ring buffer stats to measure rate of events") Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2023-09-22x86,static_call: Fix static-call vs return-thunkPeter Zijlstra2-1/+3
Commit 7825451fa4dc ("static_call: Add call depth tracking support") failed to realize the problem fixed there is not specific to call depth tracking but applies to all return-thunk uses. Move the fix to the appropriate place and condition. Fixes: ee88d363d156 ("x86,static_call: Use alternative RET encoding") Reported-by: David Kaplan <David.Kaplan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
2023-09-22x86/alternatives: Remove faulty optimizationJosh Poimboeuf1-8/+0
The following commit 095b8303f383 ("x86/alternative: Make custom return thunk unconditional") made '__x86_return_thunk' a placeholder value. All code setting X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK also changes the value of 'x86_return_thunk'. So the optimization at the beginning of apply_returns() is dead code. Also, before the above-mentioned commit, the optimization actually had a bug It bypassed __static_call_fixup(), causing some raw returns to remain unpatched in static call trampolines. Thus the 'Fixes' tag. Fixes: d2408e043e72 ("x86/alternative: Optimize returns patching") Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/16d19d2249d4485d8380fb215ffaae81e6b8119e.1693889988.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
2023-09-22i2c: xiic: Correct return value check for xiic_reinit()Daniel Scally1-1/+1
The error paths for xiic_reinit() return negative values on failure and 0 on success - this error message therefore is triggered on _success_ rather than failure. Correct the condition so it's only shown on failure as intended. Fixes: 8fa9c9388053 ("i2c: xiic: return value of xiic_reinit") Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
2023-09-22gpio: sim: fix an invalid __free() usageBartosz Golaszewski1-37/+23
gpio_sim_make_line_names() returns NULL or ERR_PTR() so we must not use __free(kfree) on the returned address. Split this function into two, one that determines the size of the "gpio-line-names" array to allocate and one that actually sets the names at correct offsets. The allocation and assignment of the managed pointer happens in between. Fixes: 3faf89f27aab ("gpio: sim: simplify code with cleanup helpers") Reported-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/07c32bf1-6c1a-49d9-b97d-f0ae4a2b42ab@p183/ Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
2023-09-22MAINTAINERS: remove myself as nouveau maintainerBen Skeggs1-1/+0
I have resigned, and will no longer be taking as active a role in nouveau development. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230918222225.8629-1-skeggsb@gmail.com
2023-09-21MAINTAINERS: Add x86 platform drivers patchworkIlpo Järvinen1-0/+1
Add x86 platform drivers patchwork which has been missing from MAINTAINERS. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919123948.1583-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
2023-09-21KVM: x86/mmu: Open code leaf invalidation from mmu_notifierSean Christopherson3-7/+12
The mmu_notifier path is a bit of a special snowflake, e.g. it zaps only a single address space (because it's per-slot), and can't always yield. Because of this, it calls kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs() in ways that no one else does. Iterate manually over the leafs in response to an mmu_notifier invalidation, instead of invoking kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs(). Drop the @can_yield param from kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_leafs() as its sole remaining caller unconditionally passes "true". Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20230916003916.2545000-2-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2023-09-21KVM: riscv: selftests: Selectively filter-out AIA registersAnup Patel1-2/+21
Currently the AIA ONE_REG registers are reported by get-reg-list as new registers for various vcpu_reg_list configs whenever Ssaia is available on the host because Ssaia extension can only be disabled by Smstateen extension which is not always available. To tackle this, we should filter-out AIA ONE_REG registers only when Ssaia can't be disabled for a VCPU. Fixes: 477069398ed6 ("KVM: riscv: selftests: Add get-reg-list test") Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
2023-09-21KVM: riscv: selftests: Fix ISA_EXT register handling in get-reg-listAnup Patel1-14/+21
Same set of ISA_EXT registers are not present on all host because ISA_EXT registers are visible to the KVM user space based on the ISA extensions available on the host. Also, disabling an ISA extension using corresponding ISA_EXT register does not affect the visibility of the ISA_EXT register itself. Based on the above, we should filter-out all ISA_EXT registers. Fixes: 477069398ed6 ("KVM: riscv: selftests: Add get-reg-list test") Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
2023-09-21RISC-V: KVM: Fix riscv_vcpu_get_isa_ext_single() for missing extensionsAnup Patel1-1/+4
The riscv_vcpu_get_isa_ext_single() should fail with -ENOENT error when corresponding ISA extension is not available on the host. Fixes: e98b1085be79 ("RISC-V: KVM: Factor-out ONE_REG related code to its own source file") Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>