| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
While the doorbell interrupts are usually driven by the HW itself,
having a way to trigger them independently has proved to be a
really useful debug feature. As it is actually very little code,
let's add it to the VPE irqchip operations.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
After moving a VPE from a redistributor to another, we're still left
with a potential pending doorbell interrupt on the old redistributor.
That interrupt should be moved to the new one to be either cleared
or take, depending on what the hypervisor wishes to do.
So let's move it right after having execited VMOVP. This doesn't
add much cost in the !DirectLPI case (we trade a DISCARD for a MOVI),
and the cost of the DIRECTLPI case should be minimal (two extra MMIO
accesses).
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When we don't have the DirectLPI feature, we must work around the
architecture shortcomings to be able to perform the required
maintenance (interrupt masking, clearing and injection).
For this, we create a fake device whose sole purpose is to
provide a way to issue commands as if we were dealing with LPIs
coming from that device (while they actually originate from
the ITS). This fake device doesn't have LPIs allocated to it,
but instead uses the VPE LPIs.
Of course, this could be a real bottleneck, and a naive
implementation would require 6 commands to issue an invalidation.
Instead, let's allocate at least one event per physical CPU
(rounded up to the next power of 2), and opportunistically
map the VPE doorbell to an event. This doorbell will be mapped
until we roll over and need to reallocate this slot.
This ensures that most of the time, we only need 2 commands
to issue an INV, INT or CLEAR, making the performance a lot
better, given that we always issue a CLEAR on entry, and
an INV on each side of a trapped WFI.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
The normal course of action when allocating the ITS' view of a
device is to allocate the corresponding LPIs. But we're about
to introduce devices that borrow their interrupts from
some other entities.
So let's make the allocation optional.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When masking/unmasking a doorbell interrupt, it is necessary
to issue an invalidation to the corresponding redistributor.
We use the DirectLPI feature by writting directly to the corresponding
redistributor.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When we're about to run a vcpu, it is crucial that the redistributor
associated with the physical CPU is being told about the new residency.
This is abstracted by hijacking the irq_set_affinity method for the
doorbell interrupt associated with the VPE. It is expected that the
hypervisor will call this method before scheduling the VPE.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When a guest issues a INVALL command targetting a collection, it must
be translated into a VINVALL for the VPE that has this collection.
This patch implements a hook that offers this functionallity to the
hypervisor.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When a VPE is scheduled to run, the corresponding redistributor must
be told so, by setting VPROPBASER to the VM's property table, and
VPENDBASER to the vcpu's pending table.
When scheduled out, we preserve the IDAI and PendingLast bits. The
latter is specially important, as it tells the hypervisor that
there are pending interrupts for this vcpu.
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
V{PEND,PROP}BASER being 64bit registers, they need some ad-hoc
accessors on 32bit, specially given that VPENDBASER contains
a Valid bit, making the access a bit convoluted.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
On activation, a VPE is mapped using the VMAPP command, followed
by a VINVALL for a good measure. On deactivation, the VPE is
simply unmapped.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When creating a VM, the low level GICv4 code is responsible for:
- allocating each VPE a unique VPEID
- allocating a doorbell interrupt for each VPE
- allocating the pending tables for each VPE
- allocating the property table for the VM
This of course has to be reversed when the VM is brought down.
All of this is wired into the irq domain alloc/free methods.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Add the basic GICv4 VPE (vcpu in GICv4 parlance) infrastructure
(irqchip, irq domain) that is going to be populated in the following
patches.
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
When a VLPI is reconfigured (enabled, disabled, change in priority),
the full configuration byte must be written, and the caches invalidated.
Also, when using the irq_mask/irq_unmask methods, it is necessary
to disable the doorbell for that particular interrupt (by mapping it
to 1023) on top of clearing the Enable bit.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
In order to let a VLPI being injected into a guest, the VLPI must
be mapped using the VMAPTI command. When moved to a different vcpu,
it must be moved with the VMOVI command.
These commands are issued via the irq_set_vcpu_affinity method,
making sure we unmap the corresponding host LPI first.
The reverse is also done when the VLPI is unmapped from the guest.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Add the skeleton irq_set_vcpu_affinity method that will be used
to configure VLPIs.
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Add the new GICv4 ITS command definitions, most of them, being
defined in terms of their physical counterparts.
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
Marc Zyngier