Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
When a clk user requests rate that is higher than the maximum possible,
the rate shall be clamped to the maximum and not to the current value.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
The timings parser doesn't append timings, but instead it parses only
the first timing and hence doesn't store all of the timings when
device-tree has timings for multiple RAM codes. In a result EMC scaling
doesn't work if timings are missing.
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
The EMC clock marked as critical, hence it is already enabled at the
registration time.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
According to the Tegra124 TRM documentation, PLLM_MISC2 register doesn't
have the lock-enable bit as well as any other PLLM-related register. Hence
PLLM re-locking can't be initiated by software. The incorrect bit setting
should have been harmless since that bit is undefined according to TRM.
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
There are wrongly set parenthesis in the code that are resulting in a
wrong configuration being programmed for PLLM. The original fix was made
by Danny Huang in the downstream kernel. The patch was tested on Nyan Big
Tegra124 chromebook, PLLM rate changing works correctly now and system
doesn't lock up after changing the PLLM rate due to EMC scaling.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Acked-By: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
Initially Common Clock Framework isn't aware of the clock-enable status,
this results in enabling of clocks that were enabled by bootloader. This
is not a big deal for a regular clock-gates, but for PLL's it may have
some unpleasant consequences. Thus re-enabling PLLX (the main CPU parent
clock) may result in extra long period of PLL re-locking.
Acked-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313184243.GA10820@lkp-sb-ep06
|
|
When this .gitignore was added, lxdialog was an independent hostprogs-y.
Now that all objects in lxdialog/ are directly linked to mconf, the
lxdialog is no longer generated.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, every arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild explicitly includes
the common Kbuild.asm file. Factor out the duplicated include directives
to scripts/Makefile.asm-generic so that no architecture would opt out
of the mandatory-y mechanism.
um is not forced to include mandatory-y since it is a very exceptional
case which does not support UAPI.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The generic-y is redundant under the following condition:
- arch has its own implementation
- the same header is added to generated-y
- the same header is added to mandatory-y
If a redundant generic-y is found, the warning like follows is displayed:
scripts/Makefile.asm-generic:20: redundant generic-y found in arch/arm/include/asm/Kbuild: timex.h
I fixed up arch Kbuild files found by this.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This reverts commit caf6fe91ddf62a96401e21e9b7a07227440f4185.
The commit was fine but is no longer needed as of commit 3a2429e1faf4
("kbuild: change if_changed_rule for multi-line recipe"). Let's go
back to using ";" to be consistent.
For some discussion, see:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAK7LNASde0Q9S5GKeQiWhArfER4S4wL1=R_FW8q0++_X3T5=hQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
During a simple no-op (nothing changed) build I saw 39 invocations of
the C compiler with the argument "-print-file-name=include". We don't
need to call the C compiler 39 times for this--one time will suffice.
Let's change NOSTDINC_FLAGS to a simply expanded variable to avoid
this since there doesn't appear to be any reason it should be
recursively expanded.
On my build this shaved ~400 ms off my "no-op" build.
Note that the recursive expansion seems to date back to the (really
old) commit e8f5bdb02ce0 ("[PATCH] Makefile include path ordering").
It's a little unclear to me if the point of that patch was to switch
the variable to be recursively expanded (which it did) or to avoid
directly assigning to NOSTDINC_FLAGS (AKA to switch to +=) because
someone else (out of tree?) was setting it. I presume later since if
the only goal was to switch to recursive expansion the patch would
have just removed the ":".
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
* The man page for dpkg-source(1) notes:
> -b, --build directory [format-specific-parameters]
> Build a source package (--build since dpkg 1.17.14).
> <...>
>
> dpkg-source will build the source package with the first
> format found in this ordered list: the format indicated
> with the --format command line option, the format
> indicated in debian/source/format, “1.0”. The fallback
> to “1.0” is deprecated and will be removed at some point
> in the future, you should always document the desired
> source format in debian/source/format. See section
> SOURCE PACKAGE FORMATS for an extensive description of
> the various source package formats.
Thus it would be more foolproof to explicitly use 1.0 (as we always
did) than to rely on dpkg-source's defaults.
* In a similar vein, debian/rules is not made executable by mkdebian,
and dpkg-source warns about that but still silently fixes the file.
Let's be explicit once again.
Signed-off-by: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@cs.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|