| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add required PMU interrupt operations for NMIs. Request interrupt lines as
NMIs when possible, otherwise fall back to normal interrupts.
NMIs are only supported on the arm64 architecture with a GICv3 irqchip.
[Alexandru E.: Added that NMIs only work on arm64 + GICv3, print message
when PMU is using NMIs]
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-8-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU interrupt can either be a normal irq or a percpu irq.
Supporting NMI will introduce two cases for each existing one. It becomes
a mess of 'if's when managing the interrupt.
Define sets of callbacks for operations commonly done on the interrupt. The
appropriate set of callbacks is selected at interrupt request time and
simplifies interrupt enabling/disabling and freeing.
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-7-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
kvm_vcpu_kick() is not NMI safe. When the overflow handler is called from
NMI context, defer waking the vcpu to an irq_work queue.
A vcpu can be freed while it's not running by kvm_destroy_vm(). Prevent
running the irq_work for a non-existent vcpu by calling irq_work_sync() on
the PMU destroy path.
[Alexandru E.: Added irq_work_sync()]
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-6-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
When handling events, armv8pmu_handle_irq() calls perf_event_overflow(),
and subsequently calls irq_work_run() to handle any work queued by
perf_event_overflow(). As perf_event_overflow() raises IPI_IRQ_WORK when
queuing the work, this isn't strictly necessary and the work could be
handled as part of the IPI_IRQ_WORK handler.
In the common case the IPI handler will run immediately after the PMU IRQ
handler, and where the PE is heavily loaded with interrupts other handlers
may run first, widening the window where some counters are disabled.
In practice this window is unlikely to be a significant issue, and removing
the call to irq_work_run() would make the PMU IRQ handler NMI safe in
addition to making it simpler, so let's do that.
[Alexandru E.: Reworded commit message]
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-5-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The PMU is disabled and enabled, and the counters are programmed from
contexts where interrupts or preemption is disabled.
The functions to toggle the PMU and to program the PMU counters access the
registers directly and don't access data modified by the interrupt handler.
That, and the fact that they're always called from non-preemptible
contexts, means that we don't need to disable interrupts or use a spinlock.
[Alexandru E.: Explained why locking is not needed, removed WARN_ONs]
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently we access the counter registers and their respective type
registers indirectly. This requires us to write to PMSELR, issue an ISB,
then access the relevant PMXEV* registers.
This is unfortunate, because:
* Under virtualization, accessing one register requires two traps to
the hypervisor, even though we could access the register directly with
a single trap.
* We have to issue an ISB which we could otherwise avoid the cost of.
* When we use NMIs, the NMI handler will have to save/restore the select
register in case the code it preempted was attempting to access a
counter or its type register.
We can avoid these issues by directly accessing the relevant registers.
This patch adds helpers to do so.
In armv8pmu_enable_event() we still need the ISB to prevent the PE from
reordering the write to PMINTENSET_EL1 register. If the interrupt is
enabled before we disable the counter and the new event is configured,
we might get an interrupt triggered by the previously programmed event
overflowing, but which we wrongly attribute to the event that we are
enabling. Execute an ISB after we disable the counter.
In the process, remove the comment that refers to the ARMv7 PMU.
[Julien T.: Don't inline read/write functions to avoid big code-size
increase, remove unused read_pmevtypern function,
fix counter index issue.]
[Alexandru E.: Removed comment, removed trailing semicolons in macros,
added ISB]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-3-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Writes to the PMXEVTYPER_EL0 register are not self-synchronising. In
armv8pmu_enable_event(), the PE can reorder configuring the event type
after we have enabled the counter and the interrupt. This can lead to an
interrupt being asserted because of the previous event type that we were
counting using the same counter, not the one that we've just configured.
The same rationale applies to writes to the PMINTENSET_EL1 register. The PE
can reorder enabling the interrupt at any point in the future after we have
enabled the event.
Prevent both situations from happening by adding an ISB just before we
enable the event counter.
Fixes: 030896885ade ("arm64: Performance counters support")
Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> (Developerbox)
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200924110706.254996-2-alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Initial driver for PMU event counting on the Arm CMN-600 interconnect.
CMN sports an obnoxiously complex distributed PMU system as part of
its debug and trace features, which can do all manner of things like
sampling, cross-triggering and generating CoreSight trace. This driver
covers the PMU functionality, plus the relevant aspects of watchpoints
for simply counting matching flits.
Tested-by: Tsahi Zidenberg <tsahee@amazon.com>
Tested-by: Tuan Phan <tuanphan@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
Julien Thierry
Mark Rutland
Alexandru Elisei
Robin Murphy