From da5c0f119203ad9728920456a0f52a6d850c01cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:45:50 +0800 Subject: nfc: replace improper check device_is_registered() in netlink related functions The device_is_registered() in nfc core is used to check whether nfc device is registered in netlink related functions such as nfc_fw_download(), nfc_dev_up() and so on. Although device_is_registered() is protected by device_lock, there is still a race condition between device_del() and device_is_registered(). The root cause is that kobject_del() in device_del() is not protected by device_lock. (cleanup task) | (netlink task) | nfc_unregister_device | nfc_fw_download device_del | device_lock ... | if (!device_is_registered)//(1) kobject_del//(2) | ... ... | device_unlock The device_is_registered() returns the value of state_in_sysfs and the state_in_sysfs is set to zero in kobject_del(). If we pass check in position (1), then set zero in position (2). As a result, the check in position (1) is useless. This patch uses bool variable instead of device_is_registered() to judge whether the nfc device is registered, which is well synchronized. Fixes: 3e256b8f8dfa ("NFC: add nfc subsystem core") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/nfc/core.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c index dc7a2404efdf..5b286e1e0a6f 100644 --- a/net/nfc/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/core.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int nfc_dev_down(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int nfc_start_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 im_protocols, u32 tm_protocols) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ int nfc_stop_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_up(struct nfc_dev *dev, int target_index, u8 comm_mode) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_down(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ int nfc_activate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u32 protocol) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ int nfc_deactivate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u8 mode) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int nfc_data_exchange(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, struct sk_buff *skb, device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; kfree_skb(skb); goto error; @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int nfc_enable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ int nfc_disable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -1134,6 +1134,7 @@ int nfc_register_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) dev->rfkill = NULL; } } + dev->shutting_down = false; device_unlock(&dev->dev); rc = nfc_genl_device_added(dev); @@ -1166,12 +1167,10 @@ void nfc_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) rfkill_unregister(dev->rfkill); rfkill_destroy(dev->rfkill); } + dev->shutting_down = true; device_unlock(&dev->dev); if (dev->ops->check_presence) { - device_lock(&dev->dev); - dev->shutting_down = true; - device_unlock(&dev->dev); del_timer_sync(&dev->check_pres_timer); cancel_work_sync(&dev->check_pres_work); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From d270453a0d9ec10bb8a802a142fb1b3601a83098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:45:51 +0800 Subject: nfc: nfcmrvl: main: reorder destructive operations in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev to avoid bugs There are destructive operations such as nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort and gpio_free in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev. The resources such as firmware, gpio and so on could be destructed while the upper layer functions such as nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start and nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame is executing, which leads to double-free, use-after-free and null-ptr-deref bugs. There are three situations that could lead to double-free bugs. The first situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start | ... | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev release_firmware() | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort kfree(fw) //(1) | fw_dnld_over | release_firmware ... | kfree(fw) //(2) | ... The second situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start | ... | mod_timer | (wait a time) | fw_dnld_timeout | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev fw_dnld_over | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort release_firmware | fw_dnld_over kfree(fw) //(1) | release_firmware ... | kfree(fw) //(2) The third situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame | if(..->fw_download_in_progress)| nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_recv_frame | queue_work | | fw_dnld_rx_work | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev fw_dnld_over | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort release_firmware | fw_dnld_over kfree(fw) //(1) | release_firmware | kfree(fw) //(2) The firmware struct is deallocated in position (1) and deallocated in position (2) again. The crash trace triggered by POC is like below: BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in fw_dnld_over Call Trace: kfree fw_dnld_over nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev nci_uart_tty_close tty_ldisc_kill tty_ldisc_hangup __tty_hangup.part.0 tty_release ... What's more, there are also use-after-free and null-ptr-deref bugs in nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start. If we deallocate firmware struct, gpio or set null to the members of priv->fw_dnld in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev, then, we dereference firmware, gpio or the members of priv->fw_dnld in nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start, the UAF or NPD bugs will happen. This patch reorders destructive operations after nci_unregister_device in order to synchronize between cleanup routine and firmware download routine. The nci_unregister_device is well synchronized. If the device is detaching, the firmware download routine will goto error. If firmware download routine is executing, nci_unregister_device will wait until firmware download routine is finished. Fixes: 3194c6870158 ("NFC: nfcmrvl: add firmware download support") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c index 2fcf545012b1..1a5284de4341 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ void nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) { struct nci_dev *ndev = priv->ndev; + nci_unregister_device(ndev); if (priv->ndev->nfc_dev->fw_download_in_progress) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort(priv); @@ -191,7 +192,6 @@ void nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) if (gpio_is_valid(priv->config.reset_n_io)) gpio_free(priv->config.reset_n_io); - nci_unregister_device(ndev); nci_free_device(ndev); kfree(priv); } -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b