From 6952a4f646446fde9e190b62c5e45f84c6cf91aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Brauner Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:26:32 +0100 Subject: selftests: add pid namespace ENOMEM regression test We recently regressed (cf. [1] and its corresponding fix in [2]) returning ENOMEM when trying to create a process in a pid namespace whose init process/child subreaper has already died. This has caused confusion at least once before that (cf. [3]). Let's add a simple regression test to catch this in the future. [1]: 49cb2fc42ce4 ("fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID") [2]: b26ebfe12f34 ("pid: Fix error return value in some cases") [3]: 35f71bc0a09a ("fork: report pid reservation failure properly") Cc: Corey Minyard Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Adrian Reber Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Andrei Vagin Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'MAINTAINERS') diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index a6fbdf354d34..8cc9e6a7c1fa 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -13158,6 +13158,7 @@ S: Maintained T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git F: samples/pidfd/ F: tools/testing/selftests/pidfd/ +F: tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/ F: tools/testing/selftests/clone3/ K: (?i)pidfd K: (?i)clone3 -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b