From 89826cce37542f7950e8f4b9258284805e98430c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:04:54 -0500 Subject: exec: Make unlocking exec_update_mutex explict With install_exec_creds updated to follow immediately after setup_new_exec, the failure of unshare_sighand is the only code path where exec_update_mutex is held but not explicitly unlocked. Update that code path to explicitly unlock exec_update_mutex. Remove the unlocking of exec_update_mutex from free_bprm. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Greg Ungerer Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- include/linux/binfmts.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/binfmts.h') diff --git a/include/linux/binfmts.h b/include/linux/binfmts.h index a345d9fed3d8..6f564b9ad882 100644 --- a/include/linux/binfmts.h +++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h @@ -47,8 +47,7 @@ struct linux_binprm { secureexec:1, /* * Set by flush_old_exec, when exec_mmap has been called. - * This is past the point of no return, when the - * exec_update_mutex has been taken. + * This is past the point of no return. */ called_exec_mmap:1; #ifdef __alpha__ -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b