From f145928d496df35fdca86d8af77fe9610fd0055f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Anna, Suman" Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:42:19 -0500 Subject: remoteproc: fix bare unsigned type usage While there is nothing wrong with defining an unsigned integer variable or argument using the bare unsigned type, it is better to use the checkpatch preferred 'unsigned int' type. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson --- include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/remoteproc.h') diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h index 1c457a8dd5a6..f575f1ba42a1 100644 --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ struct rproc { struct idr notifyids; int index; struct work_struct crash_handler; - unsigned crash_cnt; + unsigned int crash_cnt; struct completion crash_comp; bool recovery_disabled; int max_notifyid; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b