From 9b1bf12d5d51bca178dea21b04a0805e29d60cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:34:08 -0700 Subject: signals: move cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct Oleg Nesterov pointed out we have to prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec itself and we can reuse ->cred_guard_mutex for it. Yes, concurrent execve() has no worth. Let's move ->cred_guard_mutex from task_struct to signal_struct. It naturally prevent multiple-threads-inside-exec. Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Roland McGrath Acked-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/tracehook.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/tracehook.h') diff --git a/include/linux/tracehook.h b/include/linux/tracehook.h index 10db0102a890..3a2e66d88a32 100644 --- a/include/linux/tracehook.h +++ b/include/linux/tracehook.h @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, int step) * * Return %LSM_UNSAFE_* bits applied to an exec because of tracing. * - * @task->cred_guard_mutex is held by the caller through the do_execve(). + * @task->signal->cred_guard_mutex is held by the caller through the do_execve(). */ static inline int tracehook_unsafe_exec(struct task_struct *task) { -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b