From def2fbffe62c00c330c7f41584a356001179c59c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:23:39 +0900 Subject: kconfig: allow symbols implied by y to become m The 'imply' keyword restricts a symbol to y or n, excluding m when it is implied by y. This is the original behavior since commit 237e3ad0f195 ("Kconfig: Introduce the "imply" keyword"). However, the author of this feature, Nicolas Pitre, stated that the 'imply' keyword should not impose any restrictions. (https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/19/714) I agree, and want to get rid of this tricky behavior. Suggested-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre --- scripts/kconfig/symbol.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'scripts/kconfig') diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c index 8d38b700b314..b101ef3c377a 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c +++ b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) sym_warn_unmet_dep(sym); newval.tri = EXPR_OR(newval.tri, sym->rev_dep.tri); } - if (newval.tri == mod && - (sym_get_type(sym) == S_BOOLEAN || sym->implied.tri == yes)) + if (newval.tri == mod && sym_get_type(sym) == S_BOOLEAN) newval.tri = yes; break; case S_STRING: @@ -484,8 +483,6 @@ bool sym_tristate_within_range(struct symbol *sym, tristate val) return false; if (sym->visible <= sym->rev_dep.tri) return false; - if (sym->implied.tri == yes && val == mod) - return false; if (sym_is_choice_value(sym) && sym->visible == yes) return val == yes; return val >= sym->rev_dep.tri && val <= sym->visible; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b