From 6952a4f646446fde9e190b62c5e45f84c6cf91aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Brauner Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:26:32 +0100 Subject: selftests: add pid namespace ENOMEM regression test We recently regressed (cf. [1] and its corresponding fix in [2]) returning ENOMEM when trying to create a process in a pid namespace whose init process/child subreaper has already died. This has caused confusion at least once before that (cf. [3]). Let's add a simple regression test to catch this in the future. [1]: 49cb2fc42ce4 ("fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID") [2]: b26ebfe12f34 ("pid: Fix error return value in some cases") [3]: 35f71bc0a09a ("fork: report pid reservation failure properly") Cc: Corey Minyard Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Adrian Reber Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Andrei Vagin Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/Makefile') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index 6ec503912bea..5fc587b7136f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ TARGETS += netfilter TARGETS += networking/timestamping TARGETS += nsfs TARGETS += pidfd +TARGETS += pid_namespace TARGETS += powerpc TARGETS += proc TARGETS += pstore -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b