From 28e33f9d78eefe98ea86673ab31e988b37a9a738 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Kicinski Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:16:55 -0700 Subject: bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer Commit f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") removed the crafty selection of which pointer types are allowed to be modified. This is OK for most pointer types since adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() will catch operations on immutable pointers. One exception is PTR_TO_CTX which is now allowed to be offseted freely. The intent of aforementioned commit was to allow context access via modified registers. The offset passed to ->is_valid_access() verifier callback has been adjusted by the value of the variable offset. What is missing, however, is taking the variable offset into account when the context register is used. Or in terms of the code adding the offset to the value passed to the ->convert_ctx_access() callback. This leads to the following eBPF user code: r1 += 68 r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8) exit being translated to this in kernel space: 0: (07) r1 += 68 1: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +180) 2: (95) exit Offset 8 is corresponding to 180 in the kernel, but offset 76 is valid too. Verifier will "accept" access to offset 68+8=76 but then "convert" access to offset 8 as 180. Effective access to offset 248 is beyond the kernel context. (This is a __sk_buff example on a debug-heavy kernel - packet mark is 8 -> 180, 76 would be data.) Dereferencing the modified context pointer is not as easy as dereferencing other types, because we have to translate the access to reading a field in kernel structures which is usually at a different offset and often of a different size. To allow modifying the pointer we would have to make sure that given eBPF instruction will always access the same field or the fields accessed are "compatible" in terms of offset and size... Disallow dereferencing modified context pointers and add to selftests the test case described here. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Edward Cree Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 26f3250bdcd2..3c7d3a45a3c5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6645,6 +6645,20 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields", .result = REJECT, }, + { + "arithmetic ops make PTR_TO_CTX unusable", + .insns = { + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) - + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr R1 off=68+8, ctx+const is allowed, ctx+const+const is not", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 435bf0d3f99a164df7e8c30428cef266b91d1d3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:10:15 -0700 Subject: bpf: enforce TCP only support for sockmap Only TCP sockets have been tested and at the moment the state change callback only handles TCP sockets. This adds a check to ensure that sockets actually being added are TCP sockets. For net-next we can consider UDP support. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 6 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 12 +++++++++++- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index 6424ce0e4969..c68899d5b246 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -840,6 +840,12 @@ static int sock_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, return -EINVAL; } + if (skops.sk->sk_type != SOCK_STREAM || + skops.sk->sk_protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) { + fput(socket->file); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + err = sock_map_ctx_update_elem(&skops, map, key, flags); fput(socket->file); return err; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c index fe3a443a1102..50ce52d2013d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data) int one = 1, map_fd_rx, map_fd_tx, map_fd_break, s, sc, rc; struct bpf_map *bpf_map_rx, *bpf_map_tx, *bpf_map_break; int ports[] = {50200, 50201, 50202, 50204}; - int err, i, fd, sfd[6] = {0xdeadbeef}; + int err, i, fd, udp, sfd[6] = {0xdeadbeef}; u8 buf[20] = {0x0, 0x5, 0x3, 0x2, 0x1, 0x0}; int parse_prog, verdict_prog; struct sockaddr_in addr; @@ -548,6 +548,16 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data) goto out_sockmap; } + /* Test update with unsupported UDP socket */ + udp = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0); + i = 0; + err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &udp, BPF_ANY); + if (!err) { + printf("Failed socket SOCK_DGRAM allowed '%i:%i'\n", + i, udp); + goto out_sockmap; + } + /* Test update without programs */ for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) { err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &sfd[i], BPF_ANY); -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From 34f79502bbcfab659b8729da68b5e387f96eb4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:10:36 -0700 Subject: bpf: avoid preempt enable/disable in sockmap using tcp_skb_cb region SK_SKB BPF programs are run from the socket/tcp context but early in the stack before much of the TCP metadata is needed in tcp_skb_cb. So we can use some unused fields to place BPF metadata needed for SK_SKB programs when implementing the redirect function. This allows us to drop the preempt disable logic. It does however require an API change so sk_redirect_map() has been updated to additionally provide ctx_ptr to skb. Note, we do however continue to disable/enable preemption around actual BPF program running to account for map updates. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/linux/filter.h | 2 +- include/net/tcp.h | 5 ++++ kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 19 +++++++------- net/core/filter.c | 29 +++++++++++----------- samples/sockmap/sockmap_kern.c | 2 +- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 ++- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sockmap_verdict_prog.c | 4 +-- 8 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index d29e58fde364..818a0b26249e 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ void xdp_do_flush_map(void); void bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(u32 act); void bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_redirect(u32 ifindex); -struct sock *do_sk_redirect_map(void); +struct sock *do_sk_redirect_map(struct sk_buff *skb); #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_JIT extern int bpf_jit_enable; diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h index 89974c5286d8..b1ef98ebce53 100644 --- a/include/net/tcp.h +++ b/include/net/tcp.h @@ -840,6 +840,11 @@ struct tcp_skb_cb { struct inet6_skb_parm h6; #endif } header; /* For incoming skbs */ + struct { + __u32 key; + __u32 flags; + struct bpf_map *map; + } bpf; }; }; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c index c68899d5b246..beaabb21c3a3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include struct bpf_stab { struct bpf_map map; @@ -101,9 +102,16 @@ static int smap_verdict_func(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) return SK_DROP; skb_orphan(skb); + /* We need to ensure that BPF metadata for maps is also cleared + * when we orphan the skb so that we don't have the possibility + * to reference a stale map. + */ + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->bpf.map = NULL; skb->sk = psock->sock; bpf_compute_data_end(skb); + preempt_disable(); rc = (*prog->bpf_func)(skb, prog->insnsi); + preempt_enable(); skb->sk = NULL; return rc; @@ -114,17 +122,10 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) struct sock *sk; int rc; - /* Because we use per cpu values to feed input from sock redirect - * in BPF program to do_sk_redirect_map() call we need to ensure we - * are not preempted. RCU read lock is not sufficient in this case - * with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU enabled so we must be explicit here. - */ - preempt_disable(); rc = smap_verdict_func(psock, skb); switch (rc) { case SK_REDIRECT: - sk = do_sk_redirect_map(); - preempt_enable(); + sk = do_sk_redirect_map(skb); if (likely(sk)) { struct smap_psock *peer = smap_psock_sk(sk); @@ -141,8 +142,6 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb) /* Fall through and free skb otherwise */ case SK_DROP: default: - if (rc != SK_REDIRECT) - preempt_enable(); kfree_skb(skb); } } diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index 74b8c91fb5f4..ca1ba0bbfbc2 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -1839,31 +1839,31 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_redirect_proto = { .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; -BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sk_redirect_map, struct bpf_map *, map, u32, key, u64, flags) +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_redirect_map, struct sk_buff *, skb, + struct bpf_map *, map, u32, key, u64, flags) { - struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info); + struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb); if (unlikely(flags)) return SK_ABORTED; - ri->ifindex = key; - ri->flags = flags; - ri->map = map; + tcb->bpf.key = key; + tcb->bpf.flags = flags; + tcb->bpf.map = map; return SK_REDIRECT; } -struct sock *do_sk_redirect_map(void) +struct sock *do_sk_redirect_map(struct sk_buff *skb) { - struct redirect_info *ri = this_cpu_ptr(&redirect_info); + struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb); struct sock *sk = NULL; - if (ri->map) { - sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(ri->map, ri->ifindex); + if (tcb->bpf.map) { + sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(tcb->bpf.map, tcb->bpf.key); - ri->ifindex = 0; - ri->map = NULL; - /* we do not clear flags for future lookup */ + tcb->bpf.key = 0; + tcb->bpf.map = NULL; } return sk; @@ -1873,9 +1873,10 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_redirect_map_proto = { .func = bpf_sk_redirect_map, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER, - .arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR, - .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING, + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, + .arg2_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR, .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING, + .arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; BPF_CALL_1(bpf_get_cgroup_classid, const struct sk_buff *, skb) diff --git a/samples/sockmap/sockmap_kern.c b/samples/sockmap/sockmap_kern.c index f9b38ef82dc2..52b0053274f4 100644 --- a/samples/sockmap/sockmap_kern.c +++ b/samples/sockmap/sockmap_kern.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int bpf_prog2(struct __sk_buff *skb) ret = 1; bpf_printk("sockmap: %d -> %d @ %d\n", lport, bpf_ntohl(rport), ret); - return bpf_sk_redirect_map(&sock_map, ret, 0); + return bpf_sk_redirect_map(skb, &sock_map, ret, 0); } SEC("sockops") diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 43ab5c402f98..be9a631a69f7 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -569,9 +569,10 @@ union bpf_attr { * @flags: reserved for future use * Return: 0 on success or negative error code * - * int bpf_sk_redirect_map(map, key, flags) + * int bpf_sk_redirect_map(skb, map, key, flags) * Redirect skb to a sock in map using key as a lookup key for the * sock in map. + * @skb: pointer to skb * @map: pointer to sockmap * @key: key to lookup sock in map * @flags: reserved for future use diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h index 36fb9161b34a..b2e02bdcd098 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int (*bpf_xdp_adjust_head)(void *ctx, int offset) = static int (*bpf_setsockopt)(void *ctx, int level, int optname, void *optval, int optlen) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_setsockopt; -static int (*bpf_sk_redirect_map)(void *map, int key, int flags) = +static int (*bpf_sk_redirect_map)(void *ctx, void *map, int key, int flags) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_sk_redirect_map; static int (*bpf_sock_map_update)(void *map, void *key, void *value, unsigned long long flags) = diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sockmap_verdict_prog.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sockmap_verdict_prog.c index 9b99bd10807d..2cd2d552938b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sockmap_verdict_prog.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/sockmap_verdict_prog.c @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ int bpf_prog2(struct __sk_buff *skb) bpf_printk("verdict: data[0] = redir(%u:%u)\n", map, sk); if (!map) - return bpf_sk_redirect_map(&sock_map_rx, sk, 0); - return bpf_sk_redirect_map(&sock_map_tx, sk, 0); + return bpf_sk_redirect_map(skb, &sock_map_rx, sk, 0); + return bpf_sk_redirect_map(skb, &sock_map_tx, sk, 0); } char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From f7e9cb1ecb6d922584abff16db07930162c57155 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Fastabend Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 07:10:58 -0700 Subject: bpf: remove mark access for SK_SKB program types The skb->mark field is a union with reserved_tailroom which is used in the TCP code paths from stream memory allocation. Allowing SK_SKB programs to set this field creates a conflict with future code optimizations, such as "gifting" the skb to the egress path instead of creating a new skb and doing a memcpy. Because we do not have a released version of SK_SKB yet lets just remove it for now. A more appropriate scratch pad to use at the socket layer is dev_scratch, but lets add that in future kernels when needed. Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/core/filter.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index ca1ba0bbfbc2..aa0265997f93 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -3684,7 +3684,6 @@ static bool sk_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size, { if (type == BPF_WRITE) { switch (off) { - case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, mark): case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tc_index): case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, priority): break; @@ -3694,6 +3693,7 @@ static bool sk_skb_is_valid_access(int off, int size, } switch (off) { + case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, mark): case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid): return false; case bpf_ctx_range(struct __sk_buff, data): diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 3c7d3a45a3c5..50e15cedbb7f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -1130,15 +1130,27 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", }, { - "check skb->mark is writeable by SK_SKB", + "invalid access of skb->mark for SK_SKB", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", + }, + { + "check skb->mark is not writeable by SK_SKB", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = ACCEPT, + .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, + .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access", }, { "check skb->tc_index is writeable by SK_SKB", -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b From b37242c773b21edcd566e3bf995fb91d06b9537a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:34:23 +0200 Subject: bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all access tests Lets add test cases to cover really all possible direct packet access tests for good/bad access cases so we keep tracking them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 480 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 480 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 50e15cedbb7f..64ae21f64489 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6671,6 +6671,486 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end mangling, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end mangling, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_3, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end > pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' < pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' >= pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -4), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', good access", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 1", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + }, + { + "XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data)), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct xdp_md, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, -5), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .errstr = "R1 offset is outside of the packet", + .result = REJECT, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, + .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, + }, }; static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b