From f7181e5aaab58d81c5453887e39a1e1041f6bb1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Naveen N. Rao" Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 00:27:31 +0530 Subject: selftests/ftrace: Update multiple kprobes test for powerpc KPROBES_ON_FTRACE is only available on powerpc64le. Update comment to clarify this. Also, we should use an offset of 8 to ensure that the probe does not fall on ftrace location. The current offset of 4 will fall before the function local entry point and won't fire, while an offset of 12 or 16 will fall on ftrace location. Offset 8 is currently guaranteed to not be the ftrace location. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3d32e8fa076070e83527476fdfa3a747bb9a1a3a.1499453040.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc index f4d1ff785d67..2a1cb9908746 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc @@ -2,10 +2,10 @@ # description: Register/unregister many kprobe events # ftrace fentry skip size depends on the machine architecture. -# Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc +# Currently HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE defined on x86 and powerpc64le case `uname -m` in x86_64|i[3456]86) OFFS=5;; - ppc*) OFFS=4;; + ppc64le) OFFS=8;; *) OFFS=0;; esac -- cgit v1.2.3-59-g8ed1b