<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>wireguard-openbsd/bin/ed/ed.1, branch jd/queueboosts</title>
<subtitle>WireGuard implementation for the OpenBSD kernel</subtitle>
<id>https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/bin/ed/ed.1?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/bin/ed/ed.1?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/'/>
<updated>2019-07-30T09:23:35Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>In addresses, consistently use "+" rather than ".+1".</title>
<updated>2019-07-30T09:23:35Z</updated>
<author>
<name>schwarze</name>
<email>schwarze@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-30T09:23:35Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=d01da9da9f4cfc4fe4f0932604fb6beb1407d7c6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d01da9da9f4cfc4fe4f0932604fb6beb1407d7c6</id>
<content type='text'>
Both have the same meaning, but the former is explicitly defined
in this manual page as "the next line" whereas the latter requires
combining various pieces of information for understanding.
Unification suggested and patch OK'ed by martijn@.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>1. Correct the description of the g command to match POSIX and our</title>
<updated>2019-07-20T15:28:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>schwarze</name>
<email>schwarze@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-20T15:28:54Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=32c57473274a110503a52e054e0759a317459261'/>
<id>urn:sha1:32c57473274a110503a52e054e0759a317459261</id>
<content type='text'>
implementation; it was oversimplified and arguably incorrect.
2. Explicitely compare the behaviour of empty command lists for g,
empty command lists for G, and empty commands because these subtle
differences are quite confusing.
3. Say more precisely what the v and V commands do, avoiding the
fuzzy wording "similar".
All these issues were first pointed out by martijn@.
Feedback and OK martijn@; "diff reads ok" jmc@ on an earlier version.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Explain in which circumstances trailing slashes can be omitted after</title>
<updated>2019-07-15T17:57:48Z</updated>
<author>
<name>schwarze</name>
<email>schwarze@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-15T17:57:48Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=493e33563b97d3e607bbd84d5c38c59ddc33c7d3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:493e33563b97d3e607bbd84d5c38c59ddc33c7d3</id>
<content type='text'>
the g and G commands, and polish the wording a bit explaining empty
command lists.
Closing a gap in the manual reported by &lt;mazocomp at disroot dot org&gt;.
OK jmc@ martijn@
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Minor polishing:</title>
<updated>2019-07-12T19:28:48Z</updated>
<author>
<name>schwarze</name>
<email>schwarze@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-12T19:28:48Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=d397aeb5b5ea8d7144383c011441eb8462eee42e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d397aeb5b5ea8d7144383c011441eb8462eee42e</id>
<content type='text'>
* Delete a stray blank from the command line synopsis
and add the missing .Ar markup to it.
* Do not mention the terminating newline for the empty command
since it isn't mentioned for any other command either.
* Make the description of the empty command easier to understand.
Joint work with martijn@ and jmc@.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>document the dropping of the second / and ? in line address REs;</title>
<updated>2019-07-10T13:35:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>jmc</name>
<email>jmc@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-07-10T13:35:51Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=a74ab9fe9fe85b25e0aeddbc80f27277dc6a494f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a74ab9fe9fe85b25e0aeddbc80f27277dc6a494f</id>
<content type='text'>
thread started by mazocomp; diff from ropers, shortened by me;

ok martijn schwarze
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Make ed's 'l' command end lines with a '$' and make sure that literal</title>
<updated>2018-04-26T12:18:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>martijn</name>
<email>martijn@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2018-04-26T12:18:54Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=0deac3349e50ef9c7284f4444099963901bb0867'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0deac3349e50ef9c7284f4444099963901bb0867</id>
<content type='text'>
'$' characters are escaped, so that we are POSIX compliant.

The omission of trailing '$' was originally hidden behind a BACKWARDS
flag. This flag was most likely introduced to be compatible with 4.4BSD.
Thanks to naddy@ for pointing me to the 4.4BSD ed implementation.

I tried to trace the origin and enabling of the BACKWARDS flag, since
both FreeBSD and NetBSD have the flag, but only FreeBSD doesn't have it
enabled. Both projects had an alm@ working on ed during 1993-1995 during
which he added this flag to both projects and only enabled it on NetBSD,
but I wasn't able to reach him on any known address.
Thanks to Ed Schouten (ed@freebsd), and Michael W. Lucas of the ed
Mastery book for helping me trying to locate Andrew Moore.

Problem originally prodded by garzon.lucero@gmail.com and later
independently re-requested by n.reusse@hxgn.net.

OK tb@, guenther@, and mwl@mwl.io
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>nits about trailing punctuation found with mandoc -Tlint</title>
<updated>2017-07-05T12:23:46Z</updated>
<author>
<name>schwarze</name>
<email>schwarze@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2017-07-05T12:23:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=4522452324e1908f2605510bd1ad20f555f560db'/>
<id>urn:sha1:4522452324e1908f2605510bd1ad20f555f560db</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>remove the note about the list command (l) displaying a --More--</title>
<updated>2016-09-23T06:17:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>jmc</name>
<email>jmc@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2016-09-23T06:17:43Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=6cb920ff320d3d3017bce803fcefd8e89e12793f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6cb920ff320d3d3017bce803fcefd8e89e12793f</id>
<content type='text'>
prompt for huge lines (according to otto this happens only when
BACKWARDS is not defined);

ok otto
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>honestly i think you should just zap that paragraph - it doesn;t make</title>
<updated>2015-11-20T20:13:32Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tb</name>
<email>tb@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2015-11-20T20:13:32Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=9cca507621aea2b8be06331976ac90e2f98208c9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9cca507621aea2b8be06331976ac90e2f98208c9</id>
<content type='text'>
sense to document that posix more or less says something should happen,
and that it does.

jmc
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>make ed restore the user defined prompt (specified with -p) when it was turned</title>
<updated>2015-11-20T08:53:28Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tb</name>
<email>tb@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2015-11-20T08:53:28Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=7b8e45311690a7cb6e92b188891e5737086eafd9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7b8e45311690a7cb6e92b188891e5737086eafd9</id>
<content type='text'>
off and then on again with 'P'.

ok daniel@
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
