<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>wireguard-openbsd/regress/lib/libpthread/pthread_specific, branch master</title>
<subtitle>WireGuard implementation for the OpenBSD kernel</subtitle>
<id>https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/regress/lib/libpthread/pthread_specific?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/regress/lib/libpthread/pthread_specific?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/'/>
<updated>2019-05-14T16:43:26Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Remove the REGRESS_MAXTIME feature from regress framework.  The</title>
<updated>2019-05-14T16:43:26Z</updated>
<author>
<name>bluhm</name>
<email>bluhm@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-05-14T16:43:26Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=a06b5f1b2f3bda5cc27353c34b7d9739a2a57822'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a06b5f1b2f3bda5cc27353c34b7d9739a2a57822</id>
<content type='text'>
timeout based on CPU seconds is pretty useless, most hanging tests
sleep and do not spin.  The timeout could not be distinguished from
failure.  Only 3 tests used it.
OK anton@ schwarze@ cheloha@ otto@
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Use a bigger timeout, otherwise this test fails on some (not really) slower</title>
<updated>2013-12-22T11:08:31Z</updated>
<author>
<name>kettenis</name>
<email>kettenis@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2013-12-22T11:08:31Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=9ddd5bb9511c7fb8d0c4bb8ae266f5204b86227f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9ddd5bb9511c7fb8d0c4bb8ae266f5204b86227f</id>
<content type='text'>
hardware.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>This test needs a large nprocs ulimit, so just have it raise its own</title>
<updated>2012-02-20T02:19:15Z</updated>
<author>
<name>guenther</name>
<email>guenther@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2012-02-20T02:19:15Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=dc28894af77824ad9c7a083d3753ec9b58ef8631'/>
<id>urn:sha1:dc28894af77824ad9c7a083d3753ec9b58ef8631</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>various cleanups; david says results are same</title>
<updated>2003-07-31T21:48:02Z</updated>
<author>
<name>deraadt</name>
<email>deraadt@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2003-07-31T21:48:02Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=db3296cf5c1dd9058ceecc3a29fe4aaa0bd26000'/>
<id>urn:sha1:db3296cf5c1dd9058ceecc3a29fe4aaa0bd26000</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>write output to stdout instead of fprintf to stderr.  This brings it</title>
<updated>2002-06-16T23:05:14Z</updated>
<author>
<name>marc</name>
<email>marc@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2002-06-16T23:05:14Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=f21051b8d9a0a1c5ddfa7aa262d39513e6291a3f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f21051b8d9a0a1c5ddfa7aa262d39513e6291a3f</id>
<content type='text'>
in line with all of the other pthread regression tests.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>test pthread_key_create(), pthread_key_delete(), pthread_getspecific()</title>
<updated>2002-05-03T10:08:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>wcobb</name>
<email>wcobb@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2002-05-03T10:08:55Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=2d0554b95dab222da3a095edccbcbc3fff148123'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2d0554b95dab222da3a095edccbcbc3fff148123</id>
<content type='text'>
and pthread_setspecific().

ok fgsch@.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
