<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>wireguard-openbsd/sys/arch/amd64/stand/libsa/biosdev.h, branch jd/queueboosts</title>
<subtitle>WireGuard implementation for the OpenBSD kernel</subtitle>
<id>https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/sys/arch/amd64/stand/libsa/biosdev.h?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/sys/arch/amd64/stand/libsa/biosdev.h?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/'/>
<updated>2015-09-02T01:52:25Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Initial commit of uefi boot loader of OpenBSD.</title>
<updated>2015-09-02T01:52:25Z</updated>
<author>
<name>yasuoka</name>
<email>yasuoka@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2015-09-02T01:52:25Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=7b5f1cbe91622bd1bd1c749bdc6152af184a2d92'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7b5f1cbe91622bd1bd1c749bdc6152af184a2d92</id>
<content type='text'>
ok deraadt yuo
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Clamp BIOS io attempts to &lt; 2 ^28 - 1 sectors (a.k.a. 128GB for</title>
<updated>2011-03-14T22:14:40Z</updated>
<author>
<name>krw</name>
<email>krw@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2011-03-14T22:14:40Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=9730fd37491dd2fe90572721f0d53243f6476a5b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9730fd37491dd2fe90572721f0d53243f6476a5b</id>
<content type='text'>
512-byte sectors) as some BIOSen get confused when we ask for sectors
higher up.

Uss u_int throughout the boot code to calculate sector addresses,
since 32 bits is enough to do 28  ^ 1 - 1 arithmetic. Add checks
for wraparound.

I can now install and boot from the 7th extended partition below
128GB.

Much feedback &amp; guidance from deraadt@. Also from weingart@ on
BIOS io.

ok deraadt@ (less a couple of minor tweaks found in testing)
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Change daddr_t to daddr32_t.  The bootblocks on our architectures only</title>
<updated>2011-03-13T00:13:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>deraadt</name>
<email>deraadt@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2011-03-13T00:13:51Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=214337f8c3680e35c7d0ca8689f5f1b5ab3c8e22'/>
<id>urn:sha1:214337f8c3680e35c7d0ca8689f5f1b5ab3c8e22</id>
<content type='text'>
do 32-bit block spanning.  If later on we get some that can/should do
64-bit, that can be done now using daddr64_t (but of course, we are taking
this step to finalize the daddr_t 64-bit conversion).
ok miod krw
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>clone "Control key" logic from i386 written by tom; tested by art</title>
<updated>2007-04-28T19:23:10Z</updated>
<author>
<name>deraadt</name>
<email>deraadt@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2007-04-28T19:23:10Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=5b12e4700fa65484268cc9d43625400c9c33c7be'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5b12e4700fa65484268cc9d43625400c9c33c7be</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>das boot; das cloned das from das i386</title>
<updated>2004-02-03T12:09:47Z</updated>
<author>
<name>mickey</name>
<email>mickey@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2004-02-03T12:09:47Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=a47f7207b6b3b05f0a6c21b1e882152796fa9ac6'/>
<id>urn:sha1:a47f7207b6b3b05f0a6c21b1e882152796fa9ac6</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
