<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>wireguard-openbsd/sys/arch/sh/include/lock.h, branch jd/queueboosts</title>
<subtitle>WireGuard implementation for the OpenBSD kernel</subtitle>
<id>https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/sys/arch/sh/include/lock.h?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/atom/sys/arch/sh/include/lock.h?h=jd%2Fqueueboosts'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/'/>
<updated>2013-05-21T20:05:30Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>remove unused cpu_lock code (where it is truly unused). it is not</title>
<updated>2013-05-21T20:05:30Z</updated>
<author>
<name>tedu</name>
<email>tedu@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2013-05-21T20:05:30Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=dc809bae3e7cea798d871006a9d0888b9a712566'/>
<id>urn:sha1:dc809bae3e7cea798d871006a9d0888b9a712566</id>
<content type='text'>
part of the future we have planned. middling ok from a few
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>cut down simple locks (so simple that they don't even lock) to the point</title>
<updated>2010-04-26T05:48:17Z</updated>
<author>
<name>deraadt</name>
<email>deraadt@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2010-04-26T05:48:17Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=56c04664878e65064c5806104f130b78fb4f5353'/>
<id>urn:sha1:56c04664878e65064c5806104f130b78fb4f5353</id>
<content type='text'>
where there is almost nothing left to them, so that we can continue getting
rid of them
ok oga
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.</title>
<updated>2008-06-26T05:42:03Z</updated>
<author>
<name>ray</name>
<email>ray@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2008-06-26T05:42:03Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=d874cce4b1d9fe6b41c9e4f2117a77d8a4a37b92'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d874cce4b1d9fe6b41c9e4f2117a77d8a4a37b92</id>
<content type='text'>
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to
catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of
code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the
actual authors.

OK deraadt@
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Preliminary bits for SuperH-based ports, based on NetBSD/sh3 codebase with</title>
<updated>2006-10-06T21:02:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>miod</name>
<email>miod@openbsd.org</email>
</author>
<published>2006-10-06T21:02:55Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-openbsd/commit/?id=95c7671f517973b2dc41562a8d6b76cbae478089'/>
<id>urn:sha1:95c7671f517973b2dc41562a8d6b76cbae478089</id>
<content type='text'>
minor changes.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
