| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
For now, it's faster:
hacl64: 109782 cycles per call
fiat64: 108984 cycles per call
It's quite possible this commit will be reverted with nice changes from
INRIA, though.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Thus we might be responding to an old errno, which could cause this to
unnecessarily fail.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
While this has a negative performance impact on x86_64, it has a
positive performance impact on smaller machines, which is where we're
actually using this code. For example, an A53:
Before: fiat32: 228605 cycles per call
After: fiat32: 188307 cycles per call
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|