fuse: quiet down complaints in fuse_conn_limit_write

commit 129a45f9755a89f573c6a513a6b9e3d234ce89b0 upstream.

gcc 15 complains about an uninitialized variable val that is passed by
reference into fuse_conn_limit_write:

 control.c: In function ‘fuse_conn_congestion_threshold_write’:
 include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:55:37: warning: ‘val’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
    55 |         *(volatile typeof(x) *)&(x) = (val);                            \
       |         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~
 include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:61:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘__WRITE_ONCE’
    61 |         __WRITE_ONCE(x, val);                                           \
       |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~
 control.c:178:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘WRITE_ONCE’
   178 |         WRITE_ONCE(fc->congestion_threshold, val);
       |         ^~~~~~~~~~
 control.c:166:18: note: ‘val’ was declared here
   166 |         unsigned val;
       |                  ^~~

Unfortunately there's enough macro spew involved in kstrtoul_from_user
that I think gcc gives up on its analysis and sprays the above warning.
AFAICT it's not actually a bug, but we could just zero-initialize the
variable to enable using -Wmaybe-uninitialized to find real problems.

Previously we would use some weird uninitialized_var annotation to quiet
down the warnings, so clearly this code has been like this for quite
some time.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.9
Fixes: 3f649ab728cda8 ("treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions