diff options
author | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> | 2015-01-12 15:45:31 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2015-01-12 23:43:09 +0100 |
commit | 2f3408c7ef471dea10b8c89932f581c9c2eaf6ef (patch) | |
tree | 3e1ed9ff83064ebb1dffb9e6900f27f5b0766e94 | |
parent | Merge tag 'topic/i915-hda-componentized-2015-01-12' into drm-intel-next-queued (diff) | |
download | linux-dev-2f3408c7ef471dea10b8c89932f581c9c2eaf6ef.tar.xz linux-dev-2f3408c7ef471dea10b8c89932f581c9c2eaf6ef.zip |
drm/i915: fix build for CONFIG_BUG=n
If CONFIG_BUG=n __WARN_printf won't be defined leading to the below
build failure. The double underscores should have told us to steer clear
of it anyway.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function ‘assert_pll’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1027:2: error: implicit declaration
of function ‘__WARN_printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
I915_STATE_WARN(cur_state != state,
Use WARN(1, ...) instead. It handles CONFIG_BUG=n gracefully and, with
the constant condition, a sane compiler should reduce it to
__WARN_printf.
This is a regression introduced by
commit e2c719b75c8c186deb86570d8466df9e9eff919b
Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Dec 15 13:56:32 2014 -0500
drm/i915: tame the chattermouth (v2)
Reported-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Reference: http://mid.gmane.org/CA+r1ZhgHTi7bS2irhtuSUs9aO=Br1dumN8=oAOeaMJDZ_ZhwBw@mail.gmail.com
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h index e008fa0c58da..66f0c607dbef 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) { \ if (i915.verbose_state_checks) \ - __WARN_printf(format); \ + WARN(1, format); \ else \ DRM_ERROR(format); \ } \ @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \ if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) { \ if (i915.verbose_state_checks) \ - __WARN_printf("WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \ + WARN(1, "WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \ else \ DRM_ERROR("WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \ } \ |