aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-11-25 17:28:35 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-11-25 17:28:35 -0800
commit63c2291f836e1279637f95c982407cb2d5f0c335 (patch)
tree23d1f6242d6ce0c70c46364891b1f8ed429676a6
parentMerge tag 's390-5.5-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux (diff)
parentx86/microcode/intel: Issue the revision updated message only on the BSP (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-63c2291f836e1279637f95c982407cb2d5f0c335.tar.xz
linux-dev-63c2291f836e1279637f95c982407cb2d5f0c335.zip
Merge branch 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 microcode updates from Borislav Petkov: "This converts the late loading method to load the microcode in parallel (vs sequentially currently). The patch remained in linux-next for the maximum amount of time so that any potential and hard to debug fallout be minimized. Now cloud folks have their milliseconds back but all the normal people should use early loading anyway :-)" * 'x86-microcode-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/microcode/intel: Issue the revision updated message only on the BSP x86/microcode: Update late microcode in parallel x86/microcode/amd: Fix two -Wunused-but-set-variable warnings
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c4
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c36
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c5
3 files changed, 26 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index a0e52bd00ecc..3f6b137ef4e6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(unsigned int cpuid_1_eax)
void reload_ucode_amd(void)
{
struct microcode_amd *mc;
- u32 rev, dummy;
+ u32 rev, dummy __always_unused;
mc = (struct microcode_amd *)amd_ucode_patch;
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
struct ucode_patch *p;
enum ucode_state ret;
- u32 rev, dummy;
+ u32 rev, dummy __always_unused;
BUG_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index cb0fdcaf1415..7019d4b2df0c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -63,11 +63,6 @@ LIST_HEAD(microcode_cache);
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex);
-/*
- * Serialize late loading so that CPUs get updated one-by-one.
- */
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(update_lock);
-
struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
struct cpu_info_ctx {
@@ -566,11 +561,18 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_in, NSEC_PER_SEC))
return -1;
- raw_spin_lock(&update_lock);
- apply_microcode_local(&err);
- raw_spin_unlock(&update_lock);
+ /*
+ * On an SMT system, it suffices to load the microcode on one sibling of
+ * the core because the microcode engine is shared between the threads.
+ * Synchronization still needs to take place so that no concurrent
+ * loading attempts happen on multiple threads of an SMT core. See
+ * below.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_first(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) == cpu)
+ apply_microcode_local(&err);
+ else
+ goto wait_for_siblings;
- /* siblings return UCODE_OK because their engine got updated already */
if (err > UCODE_NFOUND) {
pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu);
ret = -1;
@@ -578,14 +580,18 @@ static int __reload_late(void *info)
ret = 1;
}
+wait_for_siblings:
+ if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_out, NSEC_PER_SEC))
+ panic("Timeout during microcode update!\n");
+
/*
- * Increase the wait timeout to a safe value here since we're
- * serializing the microcode update and that could take a while on a
- * large number of CPUs. And that is fine as the *actual* timeout will
- * be determined by the last CPU finished updating and thus cut short.
+ * At least one thread has completed update on each core.
+ * For others, simply call the update to make sure the
+ * per-cpu cpuinfo can be updated with right microcode
+ * revision.
*/
- if (__wait_for_cpus(&late_cpus_out, NSEC_PER_SEC * num_online_cpus()))
- panic("Timeout during microcode update!\n");
+ if (cpumask_first(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) != cpu)
+ apply_microcode_local(&err);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index ce799cfe9434..6a99535d7f37 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -791,6 +791,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+ bool bsp = c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index;
struct microcode_intel *mc;
enum ucode_state ret;
static int prev_rev;
@@ -836,7 +837,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
return UCODE_ERROR;
}
- if (rev != prev_rev) {
+ if (bsp && rev != prev_rev) {
pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
rev,
mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
@@ -852,7 +853,7 @@ out:
c->microcode = rev;
/* Update boot_cpu_data's revision too, if we're on the BSP: */
- if (c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index)
+ if (bsp)
boot_cpu_data.microcode = rev;
return ret;