aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>2022-08-08 13:45:43 +0800
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2022-09-26 12:27:55 +0200
commit786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef (patch)
treebe700bf1e4840146bf2dca5b8199065086b54057
parentbtrfs: scrub: move logical/physical/dev/mirror_num from scrub_sector to scrub_block (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef.tar.xz
linux-dev-786672e9e1a39a231806313e3c445c236588ceef.zip
btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub
[PROBLEM] The existing scrub code for data extents always limit the block size to sectorsize. This causes quite some extra scrub_block being allocated: (there is a data extent at logical bytenr 298844160, length 64KiB) alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 mirror=1 ... scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 len=4096 mirror=1 This behavior will waste a lot of memory, especially after we have moved quite some members from scrub_sector to scrub_block. [FIX] To reduce the allocation of scrub_block, and to reduce memory usage, use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN instead of sectorsize as the block size to scrub data extents. This results only one scrub_block to be allocated for above data extent: alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=65536 mirror=1 This would greatly reduce the memory usage (even it's just transient) for larger data extents scrub. For above example, the memory usage would be: Old: num_sectors * (sizeof(scrub_block) + sizeof(scrub_sector)) 16 * (408 + 96) = 8065 New: sizeof(scrub_block) + num_sectors * sizeof(scrub_sector) 408 + 16 * 96 = 1944 A good reduction of 75.9%. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/scrub.c8
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
index 7aec821bd424..755273b77a3f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c
@@ -2671,11 +2671,17 @@ static int scrub_extent(struct scrub_ctx *sctx, struct map_lookup *map,
u8 csum[BTRFS_CSUM_SIZE];
u32 blocksize;
+ /*
+ * Block size determines how many scrub_block will be allocated. Here
+ * we use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN (64KiB) as default limit, so we won't
+ * allocate too many scrub_block, while still won't cause too large
+ * bios for large extents.
+ */
if (flags & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_DATA) {
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
blocksize = map->stripe_len;
else
- blocksize = sctx->fs_info->sectorsize;
+ blocksize = BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN;
spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock);
sctx->stat.data_extents_scrubbed++;
sctx->stat.data_bytes_scrubbed += len;