diff options
| author |   Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@oracle.com> | 2015-09-04 15:42:36 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2015-09-04 16:54:41 -0700 |
| commit | aa1057b3dec478b20c77bad07442318ae36d893c (patch) | |
| tree | 74d09f5e701f197a6f79d3d29cfe8b02e1e87496 | |
| parent | memory-hotplug: add hot-added memory ranges to memblock before allocate node_data for a node. (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-aa1057b3dec478b20c77bad07442318ae36d893c.tar.xz linux-dev-aa1057b3dec478b20c77bad07442318ae36d893c.zip | |
ocfs2: direct write will call ocfs2_rw_unlock() twice when doing aio+dio
ocfs2_file_write_iter() is usng the wrong return value ('written'). This
will cause ocfs2_rw_unlock() be called both in write_iter & end_io,
triggering a BUG_ON.
This issue was introduced by commit 7da839c47589 ("ocfs2: use
__generic_file_write_iter()").
Orabug: 21612107
Fixes: 7da839c47589 ("ocfs2: use __generic_file_write_iter()")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Ding <ryan.ding@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/file.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/file.c b/fs/ocfs2/file.c index 7210583b472f..2eb11363b1f7 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/file.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/file.c @@ -2378,6 +2378,20 @@ relock: /* buffered aio wouldn't have proper lock coverage today */ BUG_ON(written == -EIOCBQUEUED && !(iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)); + /* + * deep in g_f_a_w_n()->ocfs2_direct_IO we pass in a ocfs2_dio_end_io + * function pointer which is called when o_direct io completes so that + * it can unlock our rw lock. + * Unfortunately there are error cases which call end_io and others + * that don't. so we don't have to unlock the rw_lock if either an + * async dio is going to do it in the future or an end_io after an + * error has already done it. + */ + if ((written == -EIOCBQUEUED) || (!ocfs2_iocb_is_rw_locked(iocb))) { + rw_level = -1; + unaligned_dio = 0; + } + if (unlikely(written <= 0)) goto no_sync; @@ -2402,20 +2416,6 @@ relock: } no_sync: - /* - * deep in g_f_a_w_n()->ocfs2_direct_IO we pass in a ocfs2_dio_end_io - * function pointer which is called when o_direct io completes so that - * it can unlock our rw lock. - * Unfortunately there are error cases which call end_io and others - * that don't. so we don't have to unlock the rw_lock if either an - * async dio is going to do it in the future or an end_io after an - * error has already done it. - */ - if ((ret == -EIOCBQUEUED) || (!ocfs2_iocb_is_rw_locked(iocb))) { - rw_level = -1; - unaligned_dio = 0; - } - if (unaligned_dio) { ocfs2_iocb_clear_unaligned_aio(iocb); mutex_unlock(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_unaligned_aio); |