aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>2019-01-22 22:45:19 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2019-01-23 17:35:31 -0800
commite2ae4ca266a1c9a0163738129506dbc63d5cca80 (patch)
tree12c1c1309321df450462fdb2242f0c9187e8120d
parentbpf: change parameters of call/branch offset adjustment (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-e2ae4ca266a1c9a0163738129506dbc63d5cca80.tar.xz
linux-dev-e2ae4ca266a1c9a0163738129506dbc63d5cca80.zip
bpf: verifier: hard wire branches to dead code
Loading programs with dead code becomes more and more common, as people begin to patch constants at load time. Turn conditional jumps to unconditional ones, to avoid potential branch misprediction penalty. This optimization is enabled for privileged users only. For branches which just fall through we could just mark them as not seen and have dead code removal take care of them, but that seems less clean. v0.2: - don't call capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) twice (Jiong). v3: - fix GCC warning; Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c45
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ce87198ecd01..bf1f98e8beb6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6458,6 +6458,40 @@ static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
}
}
+static bool insn_is_cond_jump(u8 code)
+{
+ u8 op;
+
+ if (BPF_CLASS(code) != BPF_JMP)
+ return false;
+
+ op = BPF_OP(code);
+ return op != BPF_JA && op != BPF_EXIT && op != BPF_CALL;
+}
+
+static void opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data;
+ struct bpf_insn ja = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0);
+ struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi;
+ const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
+ if (!insn_is_cond_jump(insn->code))
+ continue;
+
+ if (!aux_data[i + 1].seen)
+ ja.off = insn->off;
+ else if (!aux_data[i + 1 + insn->off].seen)
+ ja.off = 0;
+ else
+ continue;
+
+ memcpy(insn, &ja, sizeof(ja));
+ }
+}
+
/* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
* sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure:
* struct __sk_buff -> struct sk_buff
@@ -7149,6 +7183,7 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
struct bpf_verifier_env *env;
struct bpf_verifier_log *log;
int ret = -EINVAL;
+ bool is_priv;
/* no program is valid */
if (ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_verifier_ops) == 0)
@@ -7195,6 +7230,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
if (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
env->strict_alignment = false;
+ is_priv = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
+ env->allow_ptr_leaks = is_priv;
+
ret = replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(env);
if (ret < 0)
goto skip_full_check;
@@ -7212,8 +7250,6 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr,
if (!env->explored_states)
goto skip_full_check;
- env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
-
ret = check_subprogs(env);
if (ret < 0)
goto skip_full_check;
@@ -7243,6 +7279,11 @@ skip_full_check:
ret = check_max_stack_depth(env);
/* instruction rewrites happen after this point */
+ if (is_priv) {
+ if (ret == 0)
+ opt_hard_wire_dead_code_branches(env);
+ }
+
if (ret == 0)
sanitize_dead_code(env);