aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>2009-05-08 17:28:40 +0900
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2009-05-08 11:03:26 +0200
commite5299926d7459d9fa7c7f856983147817aedb10e (patch)
treee4ea790efd6d6bb5bd41a9969b10e917f9d18678
parentx86: xen, i386: reserve Xen pagetables (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-e5299926d7459d9fa7c7f856983147817aedb10e.tar.xz
linux-dev-e5299926d7459d9fa7c7f856983147817aedb10e.zip
x86: MCE: make cmci_discover_lock irq-safe
Lockdep reports the warning below when Li tries to offline one cpu: [ 110.835487] ================================= [ 110.835616] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] [ 110.835688] 2.6.30-rc4-00336-g8c9ed89 #52 [ 110.835757] --------------------------------- [ 110.835828] inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage. [ 110.835908] swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: [ 110.835982] (cmci_discover_lock){?.+...}, at: [<ffffffff80236dc0>] cmci_clear+0x30/0x9b cmci_clear() can be called via smp_call_function_single(). It is better to disable interrupt while holding cmci_discover_lock, to turn it into an irq-safe lock - we can deadlock otherwise. [ Impact: fix possible deadlock in the MCE code ] Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> LKML-Reference: <4A03ED38.8000700@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Reported-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c10
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c
index d6b72df89d69..cef3ee30744b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c
@@ -151,10 +151,11 @@ static void print_update(char *type, int *hdr, int num)
static void cmci_discover(int banks, int boot)
{
unsigned long *owned = (void *)&__get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned);
+ unsigned long flags;
int hdr = 0;
int i;
- spin_lock(&cmci_discover_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
u64 val;
@@ -184,7 +185,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks, int boot)
WARN_ON(!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_poll_banks)));
}
}
- spin_unlock(&cmci_discover_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
if (hdr)
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
}
@@ -211,13 +212,14 @@ void cmci_recheck(void)
*/
void cmci_clear(void)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
int i;
int banks;
u64 val;
if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
return;
- spin_lock(&cmci_discover_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
if (!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned)))
continue;
@@ -227,7 +229,7 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL2 + i, val);
__clear_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned));
}
- spin_unlock(&cmci_discover_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
}
/*