aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>2022-02-19 20:11:55 -0800
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2022-02-22 11:25:40 -0800
commitee8f97efa7a59e7f390ed2de627ddd139beb6243 (patch)
treea3ef1388f4984ab201c7cd463e7050af6680cf1f
parentMerge branch 'net-dsa-b53-non-legacy' (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-ee8f97efa7a59e7f390ed2de627ddd139beb6243.tar.xz
linux-dev-ee8f97efa7a59e7f390ed2de627ddd139beb6243.zip
gro_cells: avoid using synchronize_rcu() in gro_cells_destroy()
Another thing making netns dismantles potentially very slow is located in gro_cells_destroy(), whenever cleanup_net() has to remove a device using gro_cells framework. RTNL is not held at this stage, so synchronize_net() is calling synchronize_rcu(): netdev_run_todo() ip_tunnel_dev_free() gro_cells_destroy() synchronize_net() synchronize_rcu() // Ouch. This patch uses call_rcu(), and gave me a 25x performance improvement in my tests. cleanup_net() is no longer blocked ~10 ms per synchronize_rcu() call. In the case we could not allocate the memory needed to queue the deferred free, use synchronize_rcu_expedited() v2: made percpu_free_defer_callback() static Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220041155.607637-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--net/core/gro_cells.c36
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/core/gro_cells.c b/net/core/gro_cells.c
index 6eb2e5ec2c50..8462f926ab45 100644
--- a/net/core/gro_cells.c
+++ b/net/core/gro_cells.c
@@ -89,8 +89,23 @@ int gro_cells_init(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct net_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_init);
+struct percpu_free_defer {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ void __percpu *ptr;
+};
+
+static void percpu_free_defer_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
+
+ defer = container_of(head, struct percpu_free_defer, rcu);
+ free_percpu(defer->ptr);
+ kfree(defer);
+}
+
void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
{
+ struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
int i;
if (!gcells->cells)
@@ -102,12 +117,23 @@ void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
__netif_napi_del(&cell->napi);
__skb_queue_purge(&cell->napi_skbs);
}
- /* This barrier is needed because netpoll could access dev->napi_list
- * under rcu protection.
+ /* We need to observe an rcu grace period before freeing ->cells,
+ * because netpoll could access dev->napi_list under rcu protection.
+ * Try hard using call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu(),
+ * because we might be called from cleanup_net(), and we
+ * definitely do not want to block this critical task.
*/
- synchronize_net();
-
- free_percpu(gcells->cells);
+ defer = kmalloc(sizeof(*defer), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (likely(defer)) {
+ defer->ptr = gcells->cells;
+ call_rcu(&defer->rcu, percpu_free_defer_callback);
+ } else {
+ /* We do not hold RTNL at this point, synchronize_net()
+ * would not be able to expedite this sync.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+ free_percpu(gcells->cells);
+ }
gcells->cells = NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_destroy);