aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/ABI
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJuergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>2018-08-21 17:37:55 +0200
committerBoris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>2018-08-27 14:20:49 -0400
commitb2d7a075a1ccef2fb321d595802190c8e9b39004 (patch)
treef7112d61f399f9ee0643237d279b0ce662c9e8b0 /Documentation/ABI
parentx86/xen: don't write ptes directly in 32-bit PV guests (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-b2d7a075a1ccef2fb321d595802190c8e9b39004.tar.xz
linux-dev-b2d7a075a1ccef2fb321d595802190c8e9b39004.zip
x86/pae: use 64 bit atomic xchg function in native_ptep_get_and_clear
Using only 32-bit writes for the pte will result in an intermediate L1TF vulnerable PTE. When running as a Xen PV guest this will at once switch the guest to shadow mode resulting in a loss of performance. Use arch_atomic64_xchg() instead which will perform the requested operation atomically with all 64 bits. Some performance considerations according to: https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/ad/dc/Intel-Xeon-Scalable-Processor-throughput-latency.pdf The main number should be the latency, as there is no tight loop around native_ptep_get_and_clear(). "lock cmpxchg8b" has a latency of 20 cycles, while "lock xchg" (with a memory operand) isn't mentioned in that document. "lock xadd" (with xadd having 3 cycles less latency than xchg) has a latency of 11, so we can assume a latency of 14 for "lock xchg". Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Tested-by: Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/ABI')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions