aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/powerpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>2007-02-12 13:36:54 -0700
committerPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>2007-02-13 15:35:53 +1100
commit05cbbc692f513c0e62372abeab01b04b07096582 (patch)
tree882223fb48ddbaa5d8f92d7c1e48020e7539a668 /Documentation/powerpc
parent[POWERPC] Fixup mp5200 drivers to match device tree changes (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-05cbbc692f513c0e62372abeab01b04b07096582.tar.xz
linux-dev-05cbbc692f513c0e62372abeab01b04b07096582.zip
[POWERPC] mpc5200 device tree bindings refinement
Much needed refinement of mpc5200 device tree binding specifications. Short list: - drop mpc52xx designator; only two supported chips exist, 5200 and 5200b. It's premature to refer to them as '52xx'. - Specify optional 'model' and 'revision' properties in the soc5200 node - Specify reqiured 'cell-index' property to identify between multiple SOC devices of the same type. (Useful for arbitrating shared register access) - Specify optional 'port-number' property for adjusting the logical serial port assignments. - Specify optional 'has-wdt' property for gpt0 node. - Add system-frequency property to soc5200 node Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/powerpc')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt183
1 files changed, 121 insertions, 62 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
index 69f016f02bb0..e59fcbbe338c 100644
--- a/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
+++ b/Documentation/powerpc/mpc52xx-device-tree-bindings.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-MPC52xx Device Tree Bindings
+MPC5200 Device Tree Bindings
----------------------------
-(c) 2006 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
+(c) 2006-2007 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd
Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
********** DRAFT ***********
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ described in Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt), or passed
by Open Firmare (IEEE 1275) compatible firmware using an OF compatible
client interface API.
-This document specifies the requirements on the device-tree for mpc52xx
+This document specifies the requirements on the device-tree for mpc5200
based boards. These requirements are above and beyond the details
specified in either the OpenFirmware spec or booting-without-of.txt
-All new mpc52xx-based boards are expected to match this document. In
+All new mpc5200-based boards are expected to match this document. In
cases where this document is not sufficient to support a new board port,
this document should be updated as part of adding the new board support.
@@ -32,26 +32,26 @@ II - Philosophy
===============
The core of this document is naming convention. The whole point of
defining this convention is to reduce or eliminate the number of
-special cases required to support a 52xx board. If all 52xx boards
-follow the same convention, then generic 52xx support code will work
+special cases required to support a 5200 board. If all 5200 boards
+follow the same convention, then generic 5200 support code will work
rather than coding special cases for each new board.
This section tries to capture the thought process behind why the naming
convention is what it is.
-1. Node names
--------------
+1. names
+---------
There is strong convention/requirements already established for children
of the root node. 'cpus' describes the processor cores, 'memory'
describes memory, and 'chosen' provides boot configuration. Other nodes
are added to describe devices attached to the processor local bus.
+
Following convention already established with other system-on-chip
-processors, MPC52xx boards must have an 'soc5200' node as a child of the
-root node.
+processors, 5200 device trees should use the name 'soc5200' for the
+parent node of on chip devices, and the root node should be its parent.
-The soc5200 node holds child nodes for all on chip devices. Child nodes
-are typically named after the configured function. ie. the FEC node is
-named 'ethernet', and a PSC in uart mode is named 'serial'.
+Child nodes are typically named after the configured function. ie.
+the FEC node is named 'ethernet', and a PSC in uart mode is named 'serial'.
2. device_type property
-----------------------
@@ -66,28 +66,47 @@ exactly.
Since device_type isn't enough to match devices to drivers, there also
needs to be a naming convention for the compatible property. Compatible
is an list of device descriptions sorted from specific to generic. For
-the mpc52xx, the required format for each compatible value is
-<chip>-<device>[-<mode>]. At the minimum, the list shall contain two
-items; the first specifying the exact chip, and the second specifying
-mpc52xx for the chip.
-
-ie. ethernet on mpc5200b: compatible = "mpc5200b-ethernet\0mpc52xx-ethernet"
-
-The idea here is that most drivers will match to the most generic field
-in the compatible list (mpc52xx-*), but can also test the more specific
-field for enabling bug fixes or extra features.
+the mpc5200, the required format for each compatible value is
+<chip>-<device>[-<mode>]. The OS should be able to match a device driver
+to the device based solely on the compatible value. If two drivers
+match on the compatible list; the 'most compatible' driver should be
+selected.
+
+The split between the MPC5200 and the MPC5200B leaves a bit of a
+connundrum. How should the compatible property be set up to provide
+maximum compatability information; but still acurately describe the
+chip? For the MPC5200; the answer is easy. Most of the SoC devices
+originally appeared on the MPC5200. Since they didn't exist anywhere
+else; the 5200 compatible properties will contain only one item;
+"mpc5200-<device>".
+
+The 5200B is almost the same as the 5200, but not quite. It fixes
+silicon bugs and it adds a small number of enhancements. Most of the
+devices either provide exactly the same interface as on the 5200. A few
+devices have extra functions but still have a backwards compatible mode.
+To express this infomation as completely as possible, 5200B device trees
+should have two items in the compatible list;
+"mpc5200b-<device>\0mpc5200-<device>". It is *strongly* recommended
+that 5200B device trees follow this convention (instead of only listing
+the base mpc5200 item).
+
+If another chip appear on the market with one of the mpc5200 SoC
+devices, then the compatible list should include mpc5200-<device>.
+
+ie. ethernet on mpc5200: compatible = "mpc5200-ethernet"
+ ethernet on mpc5200b: compatible = "mpc5200b-ethernet\0mpc5200-ethernet"
Modal devices, like PSCs, also append the configured function to the
end of the compatible field. ie. A PSC in i2s mode would specify
-"mpc52xx-psc-i2s", not "mpc52xx-i2s". This convention is chosen to
+"mpc5200-psc-i2s", not "mpc5200-i2s". This convention is chosen to
avoid naming conflicts with non-psc devices providing the same
-function. For example, "mpc52xx-spi" and "mpc52xx-psc-spi" describe
+function. For example, "mpc5200-spi" and "mpc5200-psc-spi" describe
the mpc5200 simple spi device and a PSC spi mode respectively.
If the soc device is more generic and present on other SOCs, the
compatible property can specify the more generic device type also.
-ie. mscan: compatible = "mpc5200-mscan\0mpc52xx-mscan\0fsl,mscan";
+ie. mscan: compatible = "mpc5200-mscan\0fsl,mscan";
At the time of writing, exact chip may be either 'mpc5200' or
'mpc5200b'.
@@ -96,7 +115,7 @@ Device drivers should always try to match as generically as possible.
III - Structure
===============
-The device tree for an mpc52xx board follows the structure defined in
+The device tree for an mpc5200 board follows the structure defined in
booting-without-of.txt with the following additional notes:
0) the root node
@@ -115,7 +134,7 @@ Typical memory description node; see booting-without-of.
3) The soc5200 node
-------------------
-This node describes the on chip SOC peripherals. Every mpc52xx based
+This node describes the on chip SOC peripherals. Every mpc5200 based
board will have this node, and as such there is a common naming
convention for SOC devices.
@@ -125,71 +144,111 @@ name type description
device_type string must be "soc"
ranges int should be <0 baseaddr baseaddr+10000>
reg int must be <baseaddr 10000>
+compatible string mpc5200: "mpc5200-soc"
+ mpc5200b: "mpc5200b-soc\0mpc5200-soc"
+system-frequency int Fsystem frequency; source of all
+ other clocks.
+bus-frequency int IPB bus frequency in HZ. Clock rate
+ used by most of the soc devices.
+#interrupt-cells int must be <3>.
Recommended properties:
name type description
---- ---- -----------
-compatible string should be "<chip>-soc\0mpc52xx-soc"
- ie. "mpc5200b-soc\0mpc52xx-soc"
-#interrupt-cells int must be <3>. If it is not defined
- here then it must be defined in every
- soc device node.
-bus-frequency int IPB bus frequency in HZ. Clock rate
- used by most of the soc devices.
- Defining it here avoids needing it
- added to every device node.
+model string Exact model of the chip;
+ ie: model="fsl,mpc5200"
+revision string Silicon revision of chip
+ ie: revision="M08A"
+
+The 'model' and 'revision' properties are *strongly* recommended. Having
+them presence acts as a bit of a safety net for working around as yet
+undiscovered bugs on one version of silicon. For example, device drivers
+can use the model and revision properties to decide if a bug fix should
+be turned on.
4) soc5200 child nodes
----------------------
Any on chip SOC devices available to Linux must appear as soc5200 child nodes.
-Note: in the tables below, '*' matches all <chip> values. ie.
-*-pic would translate to "mpc5200-pic\0mpc52xx-pic"
+Note: The tables below show the value for the mpc5200. A mpc5200b device
+tree should use the "mpc5200b-<device>\0mpc5200-<device> form.
Required soc5200 child nodes:
name device_type compatible Description
---- ----------- ---------- -----------
-cdm@<addr> cdm *-cmd Clock Distribution
-pic@<addr> interrupt-controller *-pic need an interrupt
+cdm@<addr> cdm mpc5200-cmd Clock Distribution
+pic@<addr> interrupt-controller mpc5200-pic need an interrupt
controller to boot
-bestcomm@<addr> dma-controller *-bestcomm 52xx pic also requires
- the bestcomm device
+bestcomm@<addr> dma-controller mpc5200-bestcomm 5200 pic also requires
+ the bestcomm device
Recommended soc5200 child nodes; populate as needed for your board
-name device_type compatible Description
----- ----------- ---------- -----------
-gpt@<addr> gpt *-gpt General purpose timers
-rtc@<addr> rtc *-rtc Real time clock
-mscan@<addr> mscan *-mscan CAN bus controller
-pci@<addr> pci *-pci PCI bridge
-serial@<addr> serial *-psc-uart PSC in serial mode
-i2s@<addr> sound *-psc-i2s PSC in i2s mode
-ac97@<addr> sound *-psc-ac97 PSC in ac97 mode
-spi@<addr> spi *-psc-spi PSC in spi mode
-irda@<addr> irda *-psc-irda PSC in IrDA mode
-spi@<addr> spi *-spi MPC52xx spi device
-ethernet@<addr> network *-fec MPC52xx ethernet device
-ata@<addr> ata *-ata IDE ATA interface
-i2c@<addr> i2c *-i2c I2C controller
-usb@<addr> usb-ohci-be *-ohci,ohci-be USB controller
-xlb@<addr> xlb *-xlb XLB arbritrator
+name device_type compatible Description
+---- ----------- ---------- -----------
+gpt@<addr> gpt mpc5200-gpt General purpose timers
+rtc@<addr> rtc mpc5200-rtc Real time clock
+mscan@<addr> mscan mpc5200-mscan CAN bus controller
+pci@<addr> pci mpc5200-pci PCI bridge
+serial@<addr> serial mpc5200-psc-uart PSC in serial mode
+i2s@<addr> sound mpc5200-psc-i2s PSC in i2s mode
+ac97@<addr> sound mpc5200-psc-ac97 PSC in ac97 mode
+spi@<addr> spi mpc5200-psc-spi PSC in spi mode
+irda@<addr> irda mpc5200-psc-irda PSC in IrDA mode
+spi@<addr> spi mpc5200-spi MPC5200 spi device
+ethernet@<addr> network mpc5200-fec MPC5200 ethernet device
+ata@<addr> ata mpc5200-ata IDE ATA interface
+i2c@<addr> i2c mpc5200-i2c I2C controller
+usb@<addr> usb-ohci-be mpc5200-ohci,ohci-be USB controller
+xlb@<addr> xlb mpc5200-xlb XLB arbritrator
+
+Important child node properties
+name type description
+---- ---- -----------
+cell-index int When multiple devices are present, is the
+ index of the device in the hardware (ie. There
+ are 6 PSC on the 5200 numbered PSC1 to PSC6)
+ PSC1 has 'cell-index = <0>'
+ PSC4 has 'cell-index = <3>'
+
+5) General Purpose Timer nodes (child of soc5200 node)
+On the mpc5200 and 5200b, GPT0 has a watchdog timer function. If the board
+design supports the internal wdt, then the device node for GPT0 should
+include the empty property 'has-wdt'.
+
+6) PSC nodes (child of soc5200 node)
+PSC nodes can define the optional 'port-number' property to force assignment
+order of serial ports. For example, PSC5 might be physically connected to
+the port labeled 'COM1' and PSC1 wired to 'COM1'. In this case, PSC5 would
+have a "port-number = <0>" property, and PSC1 would have "port-number = <1>".
+
+PSC in i2s mode: The mpc5200 and mpc5200b PSCs are not compatible when in
+i2s mode. An 'mpc5200b-psc-i2s' node cannot include 'mpc5200-psc-i2s' in the
+compatible field.
IV - Extra Notes
================
1. Interrupt mapping
--------------------
-The mpc52xx pic driver splits hardware IRQ numbers into two levels. The
+The mpc5200 pic driver splits hardware IRQ numbers into two levels. The
split reflects the layout of the PIC hardware itself, which groups
interrupts into one of three groups; CRIT, MAIN or PERP. Also, the
Bestcomm dma engine has it's own set of interrupt sources which are
cascaded off of peripheral interrupt 0, which the driver interprets as a
fourth group, SDMA.
-The interrupts property for device nodes using the mpc52xx pic consists
+The interrupts property for device nodes using the mpc5200 pic consists
of three cells; <L1 L2 level>
L1 := [CRIT=0, MAIN=1, PERP=2, SDMA=3]
L2 := interrupt number; directly mapped from the value in the
"ICTL PerStat, MainStat, CritStat Encoded Register"
level := [LEVEL_HIGH=0, EDGE_RISING=1, EDGE_FALLING=2, LEVEL_LOW=3]
+
+2. Shared registers
+-------------------
+Some SoC devices share registers between them. ie. the i2c devices use
+a single clock control register, and almost all device are affected by
+the port_config register. Devices which need to manipulate shared regs
+should look to the parent SoC node. The soc node is responsible
+for arbitrating all shared register access.