diff options
| author |   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> | 2015-03-11 15:44:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> | 2015-03-18 17:36:32 +0000 |
| commit | 8b283c025443e4c3a3323c92777f422fa504caa5 (patch) | |
| tree | 20ee5fdd7d45838e7a6527a897a581b42474668f /arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | |
| parent | Linux 4.0-rc1 (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-8b283c025443e4c3a3323c92777f422fa504caa5.tar.xz linux-dev-8b283c025443e4c3a3323c92777f422fa504caa5.zip | |
ARM: exynos4/5: convert pmu wakeup to stacked domains
Exynos has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
this code to use stacked domains instead.
This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
reflect what the HW provides.
BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not
exposing the fact that the PMU block is actually the first
interrupt controller in the chain for RTC, kernels with this patch
applied wont have any suspend-resume facility when booted
with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs may not even boot.
Also, I strongly suspect that there is more than two wake-up
interrupts on these platforms, but I leave it to the maintainers
to fix their mess.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426088693-15724-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com
[ jac: squash in maz's fixup from
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5506989D.9050703@arm.com ]
Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c index 9e9dfdfad9d7..f44c2e05c82e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c @@ -166,16 +166,14 @@ static void __init exynos_init_io(void) exynos_map_io(); } +/* + * Apparently, these SoCs are not able to wake-up from suspend using + * the PMU. Too bad. Should they suddenly become capable of such a + * feat, the matches below should be moved to suspend.c. + */ static const struct of_device_id exynos_dt_pmu_match[] = { - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4415-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" }, { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pmu" }, { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-pmu" }, - { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" }, { /*sentinel*/ }, }; @@ -186,9 +184,6 @@ static void exynos_map_pmu(void) np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match); if (np) pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0); - - if (!pmu_base_addr) - panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n"); } static void __init exynos_init_irq(void) |