diff options
| author |   Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com> | 2018-05-11 10:52:17 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2018-06-05 10:54:53 +0200 |
| commit | 68565a1af9f7012e6f2fe2bdd612f67d2d830c28 (patch) | |
| tree | 536f2ee53a581e24832a250ea100c4a09635f283 /arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | |
| parent | bpf, arm32: correct check_imm24 (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-68565a1af9f7012e6f2fe2bdd612f67d2d830c28.tar.xz linux-dev-68565a1af9f7012e6f2fe2bdd612f67d2d830c28.zip | |
bpf, arm32: fix inconsistent naming about emit_a32_lsr_{r64,i64}
The names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH are emit_a32_arsh_*,
the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH are emit_a32_lsh_*, but
the names for BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH are emit_a32_lsr_*.
For consistence reason, let's rename emit_a32_lsr_* to
emit_a32_rsh_*.
This patch also corrects a wrong comment.
Fixes: 39c13c204bb1 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler")
Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
Cc: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c index 0d542007b49d..6e8b71613039 100644 --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_arsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, } /* dst = dst >> src */ -static inline void emit_a32_lsr_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, +static inline void emit_a32_rsh_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, bool sstk, struct jit_ctx *ctx) { const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1]; const u8 *tmp2 = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_2]; @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_lsr_r64(const u8 dst[], const u8 src[], bool dstk, emit(ARM_LDR_I(rm, ARM_SP, STACK_VAR(dst_hi)), ctx); } - /* Do LSH operation */ + /* Do RSH operation */ emit(ARM_RSB_I(ARM_IP, rt, 32), ctx); emit(ARM_SUBS_I(tmp2[0], rt, 32), ctx); emit(ARM_MOV_SR(ARM_LR, rd, SRTYPE_LSR, rt), ctx); @@ -767,7 +767,7 @@ static inline void emit_a32_lsh_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk, } /* dst = dst >> val */ -static inline void emit_a32_lsr_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk, +static inline void emit_a32_rsh_i64(const u8 dst[], bool dstk, const u32 val, struct jit_ctx *ctx) { const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1]; const u8 *tmp2 = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_2]; @@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K: if (unlikely(imm > 63)) return -EINVAL; - emit_a32_lsr_i64(dst, dstk, imm, ctx); + emit_a32_rsh_i64(dst, dstk, imm, ctx); break; /* dst = dst << src */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X: @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) break; /* dst = dst >> src */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_X: - emit_a32_lsr_r64(dst, src, dstk, sstk, ctx); + emit_a32_rsh_r64(dst, src, dstk, sstk, ctx); break; /* dst = dst >> src (signed) */ case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X: |