diff options
| author |   Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@windriver.com> | 2020-05-11 10:52:07 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 2020-06-25 14:47:04 +0100 |
| commit | 8dfe804a4031ca6ba3a3efb2048534249b64f3a5 (patch) | |
| tree | 98f3ed69b65171b6b53fd2103e2aaa610679596c /arch/arm64 | |
| parent | kselftest: arm64: Remove redundant clean target (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-8dfe804a4031ca6ba3a3efb2048534249b64f3a5.tar.xz linux-dev-8dfe804a4031ca6ba3a3efb2048534249b64f3a5.zip | |
arm64: perf: Report the PC value in REGS_ABI_32 mode
A 32-bit perf querying the registers of a compat task using REGS_ABI_32
will receive zeroes from w15, when it expects to find the PC.
Return the PC value for register dwarf register 15 when returning register
values for a compat task to perf.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiping Ma <jiping.ma2@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589165527-188401-1-git-send-email-jiping.ma2@windriver.com
[will: Shuffled code and added a comment]
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c index 0bbac612146e..666b225aeb3a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c @@ -15,15 +15,34 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx) return 0; /* - * Compat (i.e. 32 bit) mode: - * - PC has been set in the pt_regs struct in kernel_entry, - * - Handle SP and LR here. + * Our handling of compat tasks (PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32) is weird, but + * we're stuck with it for ABI compatability reasons. + * + * For a 32-bit consumer inspecting a 32-bit task, then it will look at + * the first 16 registers (see arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h). + * These correspond directly to a prefix of the registers saved in our + * 'struct pt_regs', with the exception of the PC, so we copy that down + * (x15 corresponds to SP_hyp in the architecture). + * + * So far, so good. + * + * The oddity arises when a 64-bit consumer looks at a 32-bit task and + * asks for registers beyond PERF_REG_ARM_MAX. In this case, we return + * SP_usr, LR_usr and PC in the positions where the AArch64 SP, LR and + * PC registers would normally live. The initial idea was to allow a + * 64-bit unwinder to unwind a 32-bit task and, although it's not clear + * how well that works in practice, somebody might be relying on it. + * + * At the time we make a sample, we don't know whether the consumer is + * 32-bit or 64-bit, so we have to cater for both possibilities. */ if (compat_user_mode(regs)) { if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_SP) return regs->compat_sp; if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_LR) return regs->compat_lr; + if (idx == 15) + return regs->pc; } if ((u32)idx == PERF_REG_ARM64_SP) |