aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>2020-07-25 18:12:31 +1000
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2020-07-26 23:34:21 +1000
commita131bfc69bc868083a6c7f9b5dad1331902a3534 (patch)
tree6406fb8fbbb103794ad0c18a0512ddd2f9e245df /arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
parentpowerpc/eeh: Drop pdn use in eeh_pe_tree_insert() (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-a131bfc69bc868083a6c7f9b5dad1331902a3534.tar.xz
linux-dev-a131bfc69bc868083a6c7f9b5dad1331902a3534.zip
powerpc/eeh: Move PE tree setup into the platform
The EEH core has a concept of a "PE tree" to support PowerNV. The PE tree follows the PCI bus structures because a reset asserted on an upstream bridge will be propagated to the downstream bridges. On pseries there's a 1-1 correspondence between what the guest sees are a PHB and a PE so the "tree" is really just a single node. Current the EEH core is reponsible for setting up this PE tree which it does by traversing the pci_dn tree. The structure of the pci_dn tree matches the bus tree on PowerNV which leads to the PE tree being "correct" this setup method doesn't make a whole lot of sense and it's actively confusing for the pseries case where it doesn't really do anything. We want to remove the dependence on pci_dn anyway so this patch move choosing where to insert a new PE into the platform code rather than being part of the generic EEH code. For PowerNV this simplifies the tree building logic and removes the use of pci_dn. For pseries we keep the existing logic. I'm not really convinced it does anything due to the 1-1 PE-to-PHB correspondence so every device under that PHB should be in the same PE, but I'd rather not remove it entirely until we've had a chance to look at it more deeply. Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725081231.39076-14-oohall@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c71
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
index 898205829a8f..d2aaaa73fdd5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_pe.c
@@ -319,52 +319,19 @@ struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get(struct pci_controller *phb,
}
/**
- * eeh_pe_get_parent - Retrieve the parent PE
- * @edev: EEH device
- *
- * The whole PEs existing in the system are organized as hierarchy
- * tree. The function is used to retrieve the parent PE according
- * to the parent EEH device.
- */
-static struct eeh_pe *eeh_pe_get_parent(struct eeh_dev *edev)
-{
- struct eeh_dev *parent;
- struct pci_dn *pdn = eeh_dev_to_pdn(edev);
-
- /*
- * It might have the case for the indirect parent
- * EEH device already having associated PE, but
- * the direct parent EEH device doesn't have yet.
- */
- if (edev->physfn)
- pdn = pci_get_pdn(edev->physfn);
- else
- pdn = pdn ? pdn->parent : NULL;
- while (pdn) {
- /* We're poking out of PCI territory */
- parent = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
- if (!parent)
- return NULL;
-
- if (parent->pe)
- return parent->pe;
-
- pdn = pdn->parent;
- }
-
- return NULL;
-}
-
-/**
* eeh_pe_tree_insert - Add EEH device to parent PE
* @edev: EEH device
+ * @new_pe_parent: PE to create additional PEs under
*
- * Add EEH device to the parent PE. If the parent PE already
- * exists, the PE type will be changed to EEH_PE_BUS. Otherwise,
- * we have to create new PE to hold the EEH device and the new
- * PE will be linked to its parent PE as well.
+ * Add EEH device to the PE in edev->pe_config_addr. If a PE already
+ * exists with that address then @edev is added to that PE. Otherwise
+ * a new PE is created and inserted into the PE tree as a child of
+ * @new_pe_parent.
+ *
+ * If @new_pe_parent is NULL then the new PE will be inserted under
+ * directly under the the PHB.
*/
-int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
+int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev, struct eeh_pe *new_pe_parent)
{
struct pci_controller *hose = edev->controller;
struct eeh_pe *pe, *parent;
@@ -398,8 +365,7 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
parent = parent->parent;
}
- eeh_edev_dbg(edev,
- "Added to device PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
+ eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Added to existing PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
pe->parent->addr);
} else {
/* Mark the PE as type of PCI bus */
@@ -431,10 +397,9 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
* to PHB directly. Otherwise, we have to associate the
* PE with its parent.
*/
- parent = eeh_pe_get_parent(edev);
- if (!parent) {
- parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
- if (!parent) {
+ if (!new_pe_parent) {
+ new_pe_parent = eeh_phb_pe_get(hose);
+ if (!new_pe_parent) {
pr_err("%s: No PHB PE is found (PHB Domain=%d)\n",
__func__, hose->global_number);
edev->pe = NULL;
@@ -442,17 +407,19 @@ int eeh_pe_tree_insert(struct eeh_dev *edev)
return -EEXIST;
}
}
- pe->parent = parent;
+
+ /* link new PE into the tree */
+ pe->parent = new_pe_parent;
+ list_add_tail(&pe->child, &new_pe_parent->child_list);
/*
* Put the newly created PE into the child list and
* link the EEH device accordingly.
*/
- list_add_tail(&pe->child, &parent->child_list);
list_add_tail(&edev->entry, &pe->edevs);
edev->pe = pe;
- eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Added to device PE (parent: PE#%x)\n",
- pe->parent->addr);
+ eeh_edev_dbg(edev, "Added to new (parent: PE#%x)\n",
+ new_pe_parent->addr);
return 0;
}