Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging from drm/drm-next for v5.16-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
index e83e0891272d..210a37a065fb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
@@ -63,6 +63,27 @@ static int mobility_rtas_call(int token, char *buf, s32 scope)
 
 static int delete_dt_node(struct device_node *dn)
 {
+	struct device_node *pdn;
+	bool is_platfac;
+
+	pdn = of_get_parent(dn);
+	is_platfac = of_node_is_type(dn, "ibm,platform-facilities") ||
+		     of_node_is_type(pdn, "ibm,platform-facilities");
+	of_node_put(pdn);
+
+	/*
+	 * The drivers that bind to nodes in the platform-facilities
+	 * hierarchy don't support node removal, and the removal directive
+	 * from firmware is always followed by an add of an equivalent
+	 * node. The capability (e.g. RNG, encryption, compression)
+	 * represented by the node is never interrupted by the migration.
+	 * So ignore changes to this part of the tree.
+	 */
+	if (is_platfac) {
+		pr_notice("ignoring remove operation for %pOFfp\n", dn);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	pr_debug("removing node %pOFfp\n", dn);
 	dlpar_detach_node(dn);
 	return 0;
@@ -222,6 +243,19 @@ static int add_dt_node(struct device_node *parent_dn, __be32 drc_index)
 	if (!dn)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
+	/*
+	 * Since delete_dt_node() ignores this node type, this is the
+	 * necessary counterpart. We also know that a platform-facilities
+	 * node returned from dlpar_configure_connector() has children
+	 * attached, and dlpar_attach_node() only adds the parent, leaking
+	 * the children. So ignore these on the add side for now.
+	 */
+	if (of_node_is_type(dn, "ibm,platform-facilities")) {
+		pr_notice("ignoring add operation for %pOF\n", dn);
+		dlpar_free_cc_nodes(dn);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	rc = dlpar_attach_node(dn, parent_dn);
 	if (rc)
 		dlpar_free_cc_nodes(dn);