clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
index abb1fdcc545a..f5e6f1c417df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tsc.h
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static inline cycles_t get_cycles(void)
 	return rdtsc();
 }
 
-extern struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(cycle_t art);
+extern struct system_counterval_t convert_art_to_tsc(u64 art);
 
 extern void tsc_init(void);
 extern void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reason);