Merge remote-tracking branch 'torvalds/master' into perf/core

To pick up fixes and move perf/core forward, minor conflict as
perf_evlist__add_dummy() lost its 'perf_' prefix as it operates on a
'struct evlist', not on a 'struct perf_evlist', i.e. its tools/perf/
specific, it is not in libperf.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index c25a67a34bd3..0ab48f1cdf84 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ static enum split_lock_detect_state sld_state __ro_after_init = sld_off;
 static u64 msr_test_ctrl_cache __ro_after_init;
 
 /*
+ * With a name like MSR_TEST_CTL it should go without saying, but don't touch
+ * MSR_TEST_CTL unless the CPU is one of the whitelisted models.  Writing it
+ * on CPUs that do not support SLD can cause fireworks, even when writing '0'.
+ */
+static bool cpu_model_supports_sld __ro_after_init;
+
+/*
  * Processors which have self-snooping capability can handle conflicting
  * memory type across CPUs by snooping its own cache. However, there exists
  * CPU models in which having conflicting memory types still leads to
@@ -1071,7 +1078,8 @@ static void sld_update_msr(bool on)
 
 static void split_lock_init(void)
 {
-	split_lock_verify_msr(sld_state != sld_off);
+	if (cpu_model_supports_sld)
+		split_lock_verify_msr(sld_state != sld_off);
 }
 
 static void split_lock_warn(unsigned long ip)
@@ -1177,5 +1185,6 @@ void __init cpu_set_core_cap_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	cpu_model_supports_sld = true;
 	split_lock_setup();
 }