diff options
| author |   Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2021-02-22 19:59:13 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2021-03-08 16:51:19 +0100 |
| commit | 52af99c3f55ff0afd815eac0271db2e1751af55c (patch) | |
| tree | 5ffd918939347a7c8422b7223fc295f69f218ba1 /drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | |
| parent | ACPI: processor: idle: Drop extra prefix from pr_notice() (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-52af99c3f55ff0afd815eac0271db2e1751af55c.tar.xz linux-dev-52af99c3f55ff0afd815eac0271db2e1751af55c.zip | |
ACPI: processor: Get rid of ACPICA message printing
The ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and ACPI_EXCEPTION() macros are used for
message printing in the ACPICA code and they should not be used
elsewhere. Special configuration (either kernel command line or
sysfs-based) is needed to see the messages printed by them and
the format of those messages is also special and convoluted.
For this reason, replace all of the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and
ACPI_EXCEPTION() instances in the ACPI processor driver with
corresponding dev_*(), acpi_handle_*() and pr_*() calls depending
on the context in which they appear.
Also drop the ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT definition that is not going
to be necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c index 813f1b78c16a..8c3f82c9fff3 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c @@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ #include "internal.h" -#define _COMPONENT ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT -ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_pdc"); - static bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle) { int cpuid, type; @@ -132,8 +129,8 @@ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in) status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) - ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, - "Could not evaluate _PDC, using legacy perf. control.\n")); + acpi_handle_debug(handle, + "Could not evaluate _PDC, using legacy perf control\n"); return status; } |