cpufreq: governor: Change confusing struct field and variable names

The name of the prev_cpu_wall field in struct cpu_dbs_info is
confusing, because it doesn't represent wall time, but the previous
update time as returned by get_cpu_idle_time() (that may be the
current value of jiffies_64 in some cases, for example).

Moreover, the names of some related variables in dbs_update() take
that confusion further.

Rename all of those things to make their names reflect the purpose
more accurately.  While at it, drop unnecessary parens from one of
the updated expressions.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 095f91cd4810..eb2fdbd9433c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void gov_update_cpu_data(struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
 		for_each_cpu(j, policy_dbs->policy->cpus) {
 			struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
 
-			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall,
+			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_update_time,
 								  dbs_data->io_is_busy);
 			if (dbs_data->ignore_nice_load)
 				j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = kcpustat_cpu(j).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
@@ -137,14 +137,14 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	/* Get Absolute Load */
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
-		u64 cur_wall_time, cur_idle_time;
-		unsigned int idle_time, wall_time;
+		u64 update_time, cur_idle_time;
+		unsigned int idle_time, time_elapsed;
 		unsigned int load;
 
-		cur_idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &cur_wall_time, io_busy);
+		cur_idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &update_time, io_busy);
 
-		wall_time = cur_wall_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall;
-		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall = cur_wall_time;
+		time_elapsed = update_time - j_cdbs->prev_update_time;
+		j_cdbs->prev_update_time = update_time;
 
 		idle_time = cur_idle_time - j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle;
 		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = cur_idle_time;
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 			j_cdbs->prev_cpu_nice = cur_nice;
 		}
 
-		if (unlikely(!wall_time || wall_time < idle_time))
+		if (unlikely(!time_elapsed || time_elapsed < idle_time))
 			continue;
 
 		/*
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		 *
 		 * Detecting this situation is easy: the governor's utilization
 		 * update handler would not have run during CPU-idle periods.
-		 * Hence, an unusually large 'wall_time' (as compared to the
+		 * Hence, an unusually large 'time_elapsed' (as compared to the
 		 * sampling rate) indicates this scenario.
 		 *
 		 * prev_load can be zero in two cases and we must recalculate it
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		 * - during long idle intervals
 		 * - explicitly set to zero
 		 */
-		if (unlikely(wall_time > (2 * sampling_rate) &&
+		if (unlikely(time_elapsed > 2 * sampling_rate &&
 			     j_cdbs->prev_load)) {
 			load = j_cdbs->prev_load;
 
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ unsigned int dbs_update(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 			 */
 			j_cdbs->prev_load = 0;
 		} else {
-			load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time;
+			load = 100 * (time_elapsed - idle_time) / time_elapsed;
 			j_cdbs->prev_load = load;
 		}
 
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		struct cpu_dbs_info *j_cdbs = &per_cpu(cpu_dbs, j);
 
-		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_cpu_wall, io_busy);
+		j_cdbs->prev_cpu_idle = get_cpu_idle_time(j, &j_cdbs->prev_update_time, io_busy);
 		/*
 		 * Make the first invocation of dbs_update() compute the load.
 		 */