crypto: inside-secure - use precise compatibles

At first we used two compatibles in the SafeXcel driver, named after the
engine revision: eip97 and eip197. However this family of engines has
more precise versions and in fact we're supporting the eip97ies and
eip197b. More versions will be supported in the future, such as the
eip197d, and we'll need to differentiate them.

This patch fixes the compatibles used in the driver, to now use precise
ones. The two historical compatibles are kept for backward
compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
index ca4bc2d28d2a..845546129d09 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_cipher.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_aes_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *ctfm,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	if (priv->version == EIP197 && ctx->base.ctxr_dma) {
+	if (priv->version == EIP197B && ctx->base.ctxr_dma) {
 		for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(u32); i++) {
 			if (ctx->key[i] != cpu_to_le32(aes.key_enc[i])) {
 				ctx->base.needs_inv = true;
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int safexcel_aead_aes_setkey(struct crypto_aead *ctfm, const u8 *key,
 		goto badkey;
 
 	/* Encryption key */
-	if (priv->version == EIP197 && ctx->base.ctxr_dma &&
+	if (priv->version == EIP197B && ctx->base.ctxr_dma &&
 	    memcmp(ctx->key, keys.enckey, keys.enckeylen))
 		ctx->base.needs_inv = true;
 
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int safexcel_aead_aes_setkey(struct crypto_aead *ctfm, const u8 *key,
 	crypto_aead_set_flags(ctfm, crypto_aead_get_flags(ctfm) &
 				    CRYPTO_TFM_RES_MASK);
 
-	if (priv->version == EIP197 && ctx->base.ctxr_dma &&
+	if (priv->version == EIP197B && ctx->base.ctxr_dma &&
 	    (memcmp(ctx->ipad, istate.state, ctx->state_sz) ||
 	     memcmp(ctx->opad, ostate.state, ctx->state_sz)))
 		ctx->base.needs_inv = true;
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int safexcel_skcipher_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
 	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
 	int ret;
 
-	BUG_ON(priv->version == EIP97 && sreq->needs_inv);
+	BUG_ON(priv->version == EIP97IES && sreq->needs_inv);
 
 	if (sreq->needs_inv)
 		ret = safexcel_cipher_send_inv(async, ring, request, commands,
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int safexcel_aead_send(struct crypto_async_request *async, int ring,
 	struct safexcel_crypto_priv *priv = ctx->priv;
 	int ret;
 
-	BUG_ON(priv->version == EIP97 && sreq->needs_inv);
+	BUG_ON(priv->version == EIP97IES && sreq->needs_inv);
 
 	if (sreq->needs_inv)
 		ret = safexcel_cipher_send_inv(async, ring, request, commands,
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ static int safexcel_aes(struct crypto_async_request *base,
 	ctx->mode = mode;
 
 	if (ctx->base.ctxr) {
-		if (priv->version == EIP197 && ctx->base.needs_inv) {
+		if (priv->version == EIP197B && ctx->base.needs_inv) {
 			sreq->needs_inv = true;
 			ctx->base.needs_inv = false;
 		}
@@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static void safexcel_skcipher_cra_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
 	if (safexcel_cipher_cra_exit(tfm))
 		return;
 
-	if (priv->version == EIP197) {
+	if (priv->version == EIP197B) {
 		ret = safexcel_skcipher_exit_inv(tfm);
 		if (ret)
 			dev_warn(priv->dev, "skcipher: invalidation error %d\n",
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ static void safexcel_aead_cra_exit(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
 	if (safexcel_cipher_cra_exit(tfm))
 		return;
 
-	if (priv->version == EIP197) {
+	if (priv->version == EIP197B) {
 		ret = safexcel_aead_exit_inv(tfm);
 		if (ret)
 			dev_warn(priv->dev, "aead: invalidation error %d\n",