aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2020-06-23 16:24:00 -0400
committerLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>2020-07-16 18:16:31 -0400
commita7e3ad5fdc51b4795cb935282819996718c0d187 (patch)
treea8f465b5111f6e836fe7fbd6ce2647f736eb5f46 /drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile
parentdrm/vblank: Register drmm cleanup action once per drm_vblank_crtc (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-a7e3ad5fdc51b4795cb935282819996718c0d187.tar.xz
linux-dev-a7e3ad5fdc51b4795cb935282819996718c0d187.zip
drm/vblank: Use spin_(un)lock_irq() in drm_crtc_vblank_off()
This got me confused for a bit while looking over this code: I had been planning on adding some blocking function calls into this function, but seeing the irqsave/irqrestore variants of spin_(un)lock() didn't make it very clear whether or not that would actually be safe. So I went ahead and reviewed every single driver in the kernel that uses this function, and they all fall into three categories: * Driver probe code * ->atomic_disable() callbacks * Legacy modesetting callbacks All of these will be guaranteed to have IRQs enabled, which means it's perfectly safe to block here. Just to make things a little less confusing to others in the future, let's switch over to spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() to make that fact a little more obvious. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200627194657.156514-3-lyude@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions