aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>2009-02-24 20:31:53 -0500
committerDave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>2009-02-25 14:47:05 +1000
commitd61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8 (patch)
treefd973d660e31ca7cc2495c3fee0db7f63ca1fcf0 /drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
parentdrm: Correct unbalanced drm_vblank_put() during mode setting. (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8.tar.xz
linux-dev-d61e7380b402a481ab1fa8027068a24918f701c8.zip
drm: edid revision 0 is valid
edid->revision == 0 should be valid (at least, so the error message indicates. :) and wikipedia seems to indicate that EDID 1.0 existed. We can dump the entire check, since edid->revision is a u8, so it can't ever be less than 0. Marko reports in RH bz#476735 that his monitor claims to be EDID 1.0, and therefore hits the check and is stuck at 800x600 because of it. Reported-by: Marko Ristola <marko.ristola@kolumbus.fi> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index e902b1cefc06..a839a28d8ee6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version);
goto bad;
}
- if (edid->revision <= 0 || edid->revision > 3) {
+ if (edid->revision > 3) {
DRM_ERROR("EDID has minor version %d, which is not between 0-3\n", edid->revision);
goto bad;
}