diff options
| author |   Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2016-08-04 16:32:19 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> | 2016-08-04 20:19:50 +0100 |
| commit | 115003e9ff0454687af35b9cb16ba970bf28dc61 (patch) | |
| tree | 79b421f8ccd321facc0133c7f79743ccf16b9f8c /drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c | |
| parent | drm/i915: Remove surplus drm_device parameter to i915_gem_evict_something() (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-115003e9ff0454687af35b9cb16ba970bf28dc61.tar.xz linux-dev-115003e9ff0454687af35b9cb16ba970bf28dc61.zip | |
drm/i915: Double check the active status on the batch pool
We should not rely on obj->active being uptodate unless we manually
flush it. Instead, we can verify that the next available batch object is
idle by looking at its last active request (and checking it for
completion).
v2: remove the struct drm_device forward declaration added in the
process of removing its necessity
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c | 15 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c index 825981b5aa40..ed989596d9a3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_batch_pool.c @@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ /** * i915_gem_batch_pool_init() - initialize a batch buffer pool - * @dev: the drm device + * @engine: the associated request submission engine * @pool: the batch buffer pool */ -void i915_gem_batch_pool_init(struct drm_device *dev, +void i915_gem_batch_pool_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool) { int n; - pool->dev = dev; + pool->engine = engine; for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list); n++) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->cache_list[n]); @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ void i915_gem_batch_pool_fini(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool) { int n; - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pool->engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex); for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(pool->cache_list); n++) { struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *next; @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool, struct list_head *list; int n; - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pool->dev->struct_mutex)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pool->engine->i915->drm.struct_mutex); /* Compute a power-of-two bucket, but throw everything greater than * 16KiB into the same bucket: i.e. the the buckets hold objects of @@ -114,7 +114,8 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool, list_for_each_entry_safe(tmp, next, list, batch_pool_link) { /* The batches are strictly LRU ordered */ - if (tmp->active) + if (!i915_gem_active_is_idle(&tmp->last_read[pool->engine->id], + &tmp->base.dev->struct_mutex)) break; /* While we're looping, do some clean up */ @@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ i915_gem_batch_pool_get(struct i915_gem_batch_pool *pool, if (obj == NULL) { int ret; - obj = i915_gem_object_create(pool->dev, size); + obj = i915_gem_object_create(&pool->engine->i915->drm, size); if (IS_ERR(obj)) return obj; |