drm/i915: Reorder execobject[] to insert non-48b objects into the low 4G

If the caller supplies more than 4G of objects and than one that has to
be in the low 4G, it is possible for the low 4G to be full before we
attempt to find room for the last object that must be there. As we don't
reorder the two types, every pass hits the same problem and we fail with
ENOSPC. However, if we impose a little bit of ordering between the two
classes of objects, on the second pass we will be able to fit the
special object as we do it first. For setups that only use !48b objects,
we now reverse the order between passes, hopefully making the subsequent
passes more likely to succeed given that we are trying a different
order (rather than repeating the previous pass!)

v2: Quick one line explanation for the relative priorities given to
reservations.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180912101133.31377-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 094c3b1cf202..bb0980793b48 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -693,9 +693,14 @@ static int eb_reserve(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 			eb_unreserve_vma(vma, &eb->flags[i]);
 
 			if (flags & EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED)
+				/* Pinned must have their slot */
 				list_add(&vma->exec_link, &eb->unbound);
 			else if (flags & __EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_MAP)
+				/* Map require the lowest 256MiB (aperture) */
 				list_add_tail(&vma->exec_link, &eb->unbound);
+			else if (!(flags & EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS))
+				/* Prioritise 4GiB region for restricted bo */
+				list_add(&vma->exec_link, &last);
 			else
 				list_add_tail(&vma->exec_link, &last);
 		}