drm/i915: Apply rps waitboosting for dma_fence_wait_timeout()

As time goes by, usage of generic ioctls such as drm_syncobj and
sync_file are on the increase bypassing i915-specific ioctls like
GEM_WAIT. Currently, we only apply waitboosting to our driver ioctls as
we track the file/client and account the waitboosting to them. However,
since commit 7b92c1bd0540 ("drm/i915: Avoid keeping waitboost active for
signaling threads"), we no longer have been applying the client
ratelimiting on waitboosts and so that information has only been used
for debug tracking.

Push the application of waitboosting down to the common
i915_request_wait, and apply it to all foreign fence waits as well.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190213092504.25709-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index c496b6e0226b..59544bb5c294 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -13559,7 +13559,7 @@ static int do_rps_boost(struct wait_queue_entry *_wait,
 	 * vblank without our intervention, so leave RPS alone.
 	 */
 	if (!i915_request_started(rq))
-		gen6_rps_boost(rq, NULL);
+		gen6_rps_boost(rq);
 	i915_request_put(rq);
 
 	drm_crtc_vblank_put(wait->crtc);