aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>2021-02-09 04:19:16 +0200
committerRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>2021-02-17 06:18:15 -0500
commit80cf9a88296c53bdbb1162d93d8640c8b2f58000 (patch)
treeec3348b3cc045fbd277b3cb7dd0e32429c4f8ba8 /drivers/gpu
parentdrm/i915: Reject 446-480MHz HDMI clock on GLK (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-80cf9a88296c53bdbb1162d93d8640c8b2f58000.tar.xz
linux-dev-80cf9a88296c53bdbb1162d93d8640c8b2f58000.zip
drm/i915: Disallow plane x+w>stride on ilk+ with X-tiling
ilk+ planes get notably unhappy when the plane x+w exceeds the stride. This wasn't a problem previously because we always aligned SURF to the closest tile boundary so the x offset never got particularly large. But now with async flips we have to align to 256KiB instead and thus this becomes a real issue. On ilk/snb/ivb it looks like the accesses just wrap early to the next tile row when scanout goes past the SURF+n*stride boundary, hsw/bdw suffer more heavily and start to underrun constantly. i965/g4x appear to be immune. vlv/chv I've not yet checked. Let's borrow another trick from the skl+ code and search backwards for a better SURF offset in the hopes of getting the x offset below the limit. IIRC when I ran into a similar issue on skl years ago it was causing the hardware to fall over pretty hard as well. And let's be consistent and include i965/g4x in the check as well, just in case I just got super lucky somehow when I wasn't able to reproduce the issue. Not that it really matters since we still use 4k SURF alignment for i965/g4x anyway. Fixes: 6ede6b0616b2 ("drm/i915: Implement async flips for vlv/chv") Fixes: 4bb18054adc4 ("drm/i915: Implement async flip for ilk/snb") Fixes: 2a636e240c77 ("drm/i915: Implement async flip for ivb/hsw") Fixes: cda195f13abd ("drm/i915: Implement async flips for bdw") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209021918.16234-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (cherry picked from commit 59fb8218c8e5001f854e7d5fdb5fb135cba58102) Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> [Rodrigo also exported some functions from intel_display.c during backport]
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c27
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c12
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h6
3 files changed, 39 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
index d30374df67f0..e3e69e6cef65 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/i9xx_plane.c
@@ -256,6 +256,33 @@ int i9xx_check_plane_surface(struct intel_plane_state *plane_state)
offset = 0;
/*
+ * When using an X-tiled surface the plane starts to
+ * misbehave if the x offset + width exceeds the stride.
+ * hsw/bdw: underrun galore
+ * ilk/snb/ivb: wrap to the next tile row mid scanout
+ * i965/g4x: so far appear immune to this
+ * vlv/chv: TODO check
+ *
+ * Linear surfaces seem to work just fine, even on hsw/bdw
+ * despite them not using the linear offset anymore.
+ */
+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4 && fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) {
+ u32 alignment = intel_surf_alignment(fb, 0);
+ int cpp = fb->format->cpp[0];
+
+ while ((src_x + src_w) * cpp > plane_state->color_plane[0].stride) {
+ if (offset == 0) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
+ "Unable to find suitable display surface offset due to X-tiling\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ offset = intel_plane_adjust_aligned_offset(&src_x, &src_y, plane_state, 0,
+ offset, offset - alignment);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
* Put the final coordinates back so that the src
* coordinate checks will see the right values.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 9843a0f202a0..7ea1e5b487b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -1322,8 +1322,8 @@ static bool has_async_flips(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
return INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 5;
}
-static unsigned int intel_surf_alignment(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
- int color_plane)
+unsigned int intel_surf_alignment(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int color_plane)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(fb->dev);
@@ -1590,10 +1590,10 @@ static u32 intel_adjust_aligned_offset(int *x, int *y,
* Adjust the tile offset by moving the difference into
* the x/y offsets.
*/
-static u32 intel_plane_adjust_aligned_offset(int *x, int *y,
- const struct intel_plane_state *state,
- int color_plane,
- u32 old_offset, u32 new_offset)
+u32 intel_plane_adjust_aligned_offset(int *x, int *y,
+ const struct intel_plane_state *state,
+ int color_plane,
+ u32 old_offset, u32 new_offset)
{
return intel_adjust_aligned_offset(x, y, state->hw.fb, color_plane,
state->hw.rotation,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
index 64ffa34544a7..76f8a805b0a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
@@ -653,6 +653,12 @@ void intel_plane_unpin_fb(struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state);
struct intel_encoder *
intel_get_crtc_new_encoder(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+unsigned int intel_surf_alignment(const struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
+ int color_plane);
+u32 intel_plane_adjust_aligned_offset(int *x, int *y,
+ const struct intel_plane_state *state,
+ int color_plane,
+ u32 old_offset, u32 new_offset);
/* modesetting */
void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *i915);