aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>2017-02-01 17:53:04 +0000
committerJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>2017-02-06 13:14:10 +0100
commita1831bb9403720db6d4c033fe2d6bd0116dd28fe (patch)
tree2a2267ebdab46668c8e7063bdaef54336e67d6e5 /drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
parentiommu/dma: Implement PCI allocation optimisation (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-a1831bb9403720db6d4c033fe2d6bd0116dd28fe.tar.xz
linux-dev-a1831bb9403720db6d4c033fe2d6bd0116dd28fe.zip
iommu/dma: Remove bogus dma_supported() implementation
Back when this was first written, dma_supported() was somewhat of a murky mess, with subtly different interpretations being relied upon in various places. The "does device X support DMA to address range Y?" uses assuming Y to be physical addresses, which motivated the current iommu_dma_supported() implementation and are alluded to in the comment therein, have since been cleaned up, leaving only the far less ambiguous "can device X drive address bits Y" usage internal to DMA API mask setting. As such, there is no reason to keep a slightly misleading callback which does nothing but duplicate the current default behaviour; we already constrain IOVA allocations to the iommu_domain aperture where necessary, so let's leave DMA mask business to architecture-specific code where it belongs. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c10
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 1c9ac26e3b68..48d36ce59efb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -734,16 +734,6 @@ void iommu_dma_unmap_resource(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t handle,
__iommu_dma_unmap(iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev), handle);
}
-int iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
-{
- /*
- * 'Special' IOMMUs which don't have the same addressing capability
- * as the CPU will have to wait until we have some way to query that
- * before they'll be able to use this framework.
- */
- return 1;
-}
-
int iommu_dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
{
return dma_addr == DMA_ERROR_CODE;