aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/mtd/chips
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>2005-05-19 18:05:47 +0100
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@mtd.linutronix.de>2005-05-23 13:21:35 +0200
commit6da70124a1cc05bdbd7c847901964edc6f634a91 (patch)
tree3cd1afd4b23b8ed31b2b92b9d11c67a854a7be63 /drivers/mtd/chips
parent[JFFS2] Convert thread start semaphore to completion (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-6da70124a1cc05bdbd7c847901964edc6f634a91.tar.xz
linux-dev-6da70124a1cc05bdbd7c847901964edc6f634a91.zip
[MTD] CFI flash locking reorg for XIP
This reworks the XIP locking to make sure no lock primitive is ever called from XIP disabled paths even if in theory they should not cause any reschedule. Relying on the current spinlock implementation is rather fragile and not especially clean from an abstraction pov. The recent RT work makes it even more obvious. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/chips')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c90
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
index 71fad1601444..8b1304531d8f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
*
* (C) 2000 Red Hat. GPL'd
*
- * $Id: cfi_cmdset_0001.c,v 1.176 2005/04/27 20:01:49 tpoynor Exp $
+ * $Id: cfi_cmdset_0001.c,v 1.178 2005/05/19 17:05:43 nico Exp $
*
*
* 10/10/2000 Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
@@ -826,10 +826,6 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
* assembly to make sure inline functions were actually inlined and that gcc
* didn't emit calls to its own support functions). Also configuring MTD CFI
* support to a single buswidth and a single interleave is also recommended.
- * Note that not only IRQs are disabled but the preemption count is also
- * increased to prevent other locking primitives (namely spin_unlock) from
- * decrementing the preempt count to zero and scheduling the CPU away while
- * not in array mode.
*/
static void xip_disable(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
@@ -837,7 +833,6 @@ static void xip_disable(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
{
/* TODO: chips with no XIP use should ignore and return */
(void) map_read(map, adr); /* ensure mmu mapping is up to date */
- preempt_disable();
local_irq_disable();
}
@@ -852,7 +847,6 @@ static void __xipram xip_enable(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
(void) map_read(map, adr);
asm volatile (".rep 8; nop; .endr"); /* fill instruction prefetch */
local_irq_enable();
- preempt_enable();
}
/*
@@ -928,7 +922,7 @@ static void __xipram xip_udelay(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
(void) map_read(map, adr);
asm volatile (".rep 8; nop; .endr");
local_irq_enable();
- preempt_enable();
+ spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
asm volatile (".rep 8; nop; .endr");
cond_resched();
@@ -938,15 +932,15 @@ static void __xipram xip_udelay(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
* a suspended erase state. If so let's wait
* until it's done.
*/
- preempt_disable();
+ spin_lock(chip->mutex);
while (chip->state != newstate) {
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue(&chip->wq, &wait);
- preempt_enable();
+ spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
schedule();
remove_wait_queue(&chip->wq, &wait);
- preempt_disable();
+ spin_lock(chip->mutex);
}
/* Disallow XIP again */
local_irq_disable();
@@ -975,12 +969,14 @@ static void __xipram xip_udelay(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
* The INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE() macro is normally used in parallel while
* the flash is actively programming or erasing since we have to poll for
* the operation to complete anyway. We can't do that in a generic way with
- * a XIP setup so do it before the actual flash operation in this case.
+ * a XIP setup so do it before the actual flash operation in this case
+ * and stub it out from INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY.
*/
-#undef INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE
-#define INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(x...)
-#define XIP_INVAL_CACHED_RANGE(map, from, size) \
- do { if(map->inval_cache) map->inval_cache(map, from, size); } while(0)
+#define XIP_INVAL_CACHED_RANGE(map, from, size) \
+ INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, from, size)
+
+#define INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip, adr, len, usec) \
+ UDELAY(map, chip, adr, usec)
/*
* Extra notes:
@@ -1003,11 +999,23 @@ static void __xipram xip_udelay(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
#define xip_disable(map, chip, adr)
#define xip_enable(map, chip, adr)
-
-#define UDELAY(map, chip, adr, usec) cfi_udelay(usec)
-
#define XIP_INVAL_CACHED_RANGE(x...)
+#define UDELAY(map, chip, adr, usec) \
+do { \
+ spin_unlock(chip->mutex); \
+ cfi_udelay(usec); \
+ spin_lock(chip->mutex); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip, adr, len, usec) \
+do { \
+ spin_unlock(chip->mutex); \
+ INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, adr, len); \
+ cfi_udelay(usec); \
+ spin_lock(chip->mutex); \
+} while (0)
+
#endif
static int do_point_onechip (struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, loff_t adr, size_t len)
@@ -1227,10 +1235,9 @@ static int __xipram do_write_oneword(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
map_write(map, datum, adr);
chip->state = mode;
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, adr, map_bankwidth(map));
- UDELAY(map, chip, adr, chip->word_write_time);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
+ INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip,
+ adr, map_bankwidth(map),
+ chip->word_write_time);
timeo = jiffies + (HZ/2);
z = 0;
@@ -1263,10 +1270,8 @@ static int __xipram do_write_oneword(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
}
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
z++;
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
}
if (!z) {
chip->word_write_time--;
@@ -1430,9 +1435,7 @@ static int __xipram do_write_buffer(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
if (map_word_andequal(map, status, status_OK, status_OK))
break;
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
UDELAY(map, chip, cmd_adr, 1);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
if (++z > 20) {
/* Argh. Not ready for write to buffer */
@@ -1478,10 +1481,9 @@ static int __xipram do_write_buffer(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
map_write(map, CMD(0xd0), cmd_adr);
chip->state = FL_WRITING;
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, adr, len);
- UDELAY(map, chip, cmd_adr, chip->buffer_write_time);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
+ INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip,
+ cmd_adr, len,
+ chip->buffer_write_time);
timeo = jiffies + (HZ/2);
z = 0;
@@ -1513,10 +1515,8 @@ static int __xipram do_write_buffer(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
}
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- UDELAY(map, chip, cmd_adr, 1);
z++;
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
+ UDELAY(map, chip, cmd_adr, 1);
}
if (!z) {
chip->buffer_write_time--;
@@ -1644,10 +1644,9 @@ static int __xipram do_erase_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
chip->state = FL_ERASING;
chip->erase_suspended = 0;
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
- INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, adr, len);
- UDELAY(map, chip, adr, chip->erase_time*1000/2);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
+ INVALIDATE_CACHE_UDELAY(map, chip,
+ adr, len,
+ chip->erase_time*1000/2);
/* FIXME. Use a timer to check this, and return immediately. */
/* Once the state machine's known to be working I'll do that */
@@ -1692,9 +1691,7 @@ static int __xipram do_erase_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
}
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1000000/HZ);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
}
/* We've broken this before. It doesn't hurt to be safe */
@@ -1866,11 +1863,8 @@ static int __xipram do_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip
* to delay.
*/
- if (!extp || !(extp->FeatureSupport & (1 << 5))) {
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
+ if (!extp || !(extp->FeatureSupport & (1 << 5)))
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1000000/HZ);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
- }
/* FIXME. Use a timer to check this, and return immediately. */
/* Once the state machine's known to be working I'll do that */
@@ -1897,9 +1891,7 @@ static int __xipram do_xxlock_oneblock(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip
}
/* Latency issues. Drop the lock, wait a while and retry */
- spin_unlock(chip->mutex);
UDELAY(map, chip, adr, 1);
- spin_lock(chip->mutex);
}
/* Done and happy. */
@@ -1979,8 +1971,7 @@ do_otp_read(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, u_long offset,
}
/* let's ensure we're not reading back cached data from array mode */
- if (map->inval_cache)
- map->inval_cache(map, chip->start + offset, size);
+ INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, chip->start + offset, size);
xip_disable(map, chip, chip->start);
if (chip->state != FL_JEDEC_QUERY) {
@@ -1991,8 +1982,7 @@ do_otp_read(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, u_long offset,
xip_enable(map, chip, chip->start);
/* then ensure we don't keep OTP data in the cache */
- if (map->inval_cache)
- map->inval_cache(map, chip->start + offset, size);
+ INVALIDATE_CACHED_RANGE(map, chip->start + offset, size);
put_chip(map, chip, chip->start);
spin_unlock(chip->mutex);