UBI: replace memcpy with struct assignment

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.

Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
index 9f2ebd8750e7..ec2c2dc1c1ca 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c
@@ -64,8 +64,7 @@ static int set_update_marker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol)
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	memcpy(&vtbl_rec, &ubi->vtbl[vol->vol_id],
-	       sizeof(struct ubi_vtbl_record));
+	vtbl_rec = ubi->vtbl[vol->vol_id];
 	vtbl_rec.upd_marker = 1;
 
 	mutex_lock(&ubi->device_mutex);
@@ -93,8 +92,7 @@ static int clear_update_marker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol,
 
 	dbg_gen("clear update marker for volume %d", vol->vol_id);
 
-	memcpy(&vtbl_rec, &ubi->vtbl[vol->vol_id],
-	       sizeof(struct ubi_vtbl_record));
+	vtbl_rec = ubi->vtbl[vol->vol_id];
 	ubi_assert(vol->upd_marker && vtbl_rec.upd_marker);
 	vtbl_rec.upd_marker = 0;