qed: fix handling of concurrent ramrods.

Concurrent non-blocking slowpath ramrods can be completed
out-of-order on the completion chain. Recycling completed elements,
while previously sent elements are still completion pending,
can lead to overriding of active elements on the chain. Furthermore,
sending pending slowpath ramrods currently lacks the update of the
chain element physical pointer.

This patch:
* Ensures that ramrods are sent to the FW with
  consecutive echo values.
* Handles out-of-order completions by freeing only first
  successive completed entries.
* Updates the chain element physical pointer when copying
  a pending element into a free element for sending.

Signed-off-by: Tomer Tayar <Tomer.Tayar@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Manish Chopra <manish.chopra@qlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 48 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_spq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_spq.c
index 7c0b8459666e..3dd548ab8df1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_spq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_spq.c
@@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ static int
 qed_spq_fill_entry(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 		   struct qed_spq_entry *p_ent)
 {
-	p_ent->elem.hdr.echo = 0;
-	p_hwfn->p_spq->echo_idx++;
 	p_ent->flags = 0;
 
 	switch (p_ent->comp_mode) {
@@ -195,10 +193,12 @@ static int qed_spq_hw_post(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 			   struct qed_spq *p_spq,
 			   struct qed_spq_entry *p_ent)
 {
-	struct qed_chain		*p_chain = &p_hwfn->p_spq->chain;
+	struct qed_chain *p_chain = &p_hwfn->p_spq->chain;
+	u16 echo = qed_chain_get_prod_idx(p_chain);
 	struct slow_path_element	*elem;
 	struct core_db_data		db;
 
+	p_ent->elem.hdr.echo	= cpu_to_le16(echo);
 	elem = qed_chain_produce(p_chain);
 	if (!elem) {
 		DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn, "Failed to produce from SPQ chain\n");
@@ -437,7 +437,9 @@ void qed_spq_setup(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn)
 	p_spq->comp_count		= 0;
 	p_spq->comp_sent_count		= 0;
 	p_spq->unlimited_pending_count	= 0;
-	p_spq->echo_idx			= 0;
+
+	bitmap_zero(p_spq->p_comp_bitmap, SPQ_RING_SIZE);
+	p_spq->comp_bitmap_idx = 0;
 
 	/* SPQ cid, cannot fail */
 	qed_cxt_acquire_cid(p_hwfn, PROTOCOLID_CORE, &p_spq->cid);
@@ -582,26 +584,32 @@ qed_spq_add_entry(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 	struct qed_spq *p_spq = p_hwfn->p_spq;
 
 	if (p_ent->queue == &p_spq->unlimited_pending) {
-		struct qed_spq_entry *p_en2;
 
 		if (list_empty(&p_spq->free_pool)) {
 			list_add_tail(&p_ent->list, &p_spq->unlimited_pending);
 			p_spq->unlimited_pending_count++;
 
 			return 0;
-		}
+		} else {
+			struct qed_spq_entry *p_en2;
 
-		p_en2 = list_first_entry(&p_spq->free_pool,
-					 struct qed_spq_entry,
-					 list);
-		list_del(&p_en2->list);
+			p_en2 = list_first_entry(&p_spq->free_pool,
+						 struct qed_spq_entry,
+						 list);
+			list_del(&p_en2->list);
+
+			/* Copy the ring element physical pointer to the new
+			 * entry, since we are about to override the entire ring
+			 * entry and don't want to lose the pointer.
+			 */
+			p_ent->elem.data_ptr = p_en2->elem.data_ptr;
 
-		/* Strcut assignment */
-		*p_en2 = *p_ent;
+			*p_en2 = *p_ent;
 
-		kfree(p_ent);
+			kfree(p_ent);
 
-		p_ent = p_en2;
+			p_ent = p_en2;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* entry is to be placed in 'pending' queue */
@@ -777,13 +785,38 @@ int qed_spq_completion(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn,
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(p_ent, tmp, &p_spq->completion_pending,
 				 list) {
 		if (p_ent->elem.hdr.echo == echo) {
+			u16 pos = le16_to_cpu(echo) % SPQ_RING_SIZE;
+
 			list_del(&p_ent->list);
 
-			qed_chain_return_produced(&p_spq->chain);
+			/* Avoid overriding of SPQ entries when getting
+			 * out-of-order completions, by marking the completions
+			 * in a bitmap and increasing the chain consumer only
+			 * for the first successive completed entries.
+			 */
+			bitmap_set(p_spq->p_comp_bitmap, pos, SPQ_RING_SIZE);
+
+			while (test_bit(p_spq->comp_bitmap_idx,
+					p_spq->p_comp_bitmap)) {
+				bitmap_clear(p_spq->p_comp_bitmap,
+					     p_spq->comp_bitmap_idx,
+					     SPQ_RING_SIZE);
+				p_spq->comp_bitmap_idx++;
+				qed_chain_return_produced(&p_spq->chain);
+			}
+
 			p_spq->comp_count++;
 			found = p_ent;
 			break;
 		}
+
+		/* This is relatively uncommon - depends on scenarios
+		 * which have mutliple per-PF sent ramrods.
+		 */
+		DP_VERBOSE(p_hwfn, QED_MSG_SPQ,
+			   "Got completion for echo %04x - doesn't match echo %04x in completion pending list\n",
+			   le16_to_cpu(echo),
+			   le16_to_cpu(p_ent->elem.hdr.echo));
 	}
 
 	/* Release lock before callback, as callback may post