aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDon Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>2009-07-02 12:50:31 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2009-07-03 19:11:00 -0700
commit19343de279d28e4ed039c8ad00510d19dc4d6d12 (patch)
tree57b7cf0980ec1c887e48d616b97f1ae158933345 /drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
parentixgbe: fix issues with failing to detect insert of unsupported module (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-19343de279d28e4ed039c8ad00510d19dc4d6d12.tar.xz
linux-dev-19343de279d28e4ed039c8ad00510d19dc4d6d12.zip
ixgbe: fix regression on some 82598 adapters
The change to check the SFP+ module again on open() was causing the XFP (non-SFP+) adapters to be rejected. We only want to try and re-identify the SFP+ module if the original probe found that this device was an SFP+ device. So for this code path (driver loaded with SFP module, module inserted, ifconfig up of the device) the type will be ixgbe_phy_unknown for an unidentified SFP+ module. So we only check if that is the case. This problem also shows up on Copper devices. Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c24
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index aaf482c0d520..cf39f5a47037 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -2697,19 +2697,23 @@ static int ixgbe_up_complete(struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
/*
* For hot-pluggable SFP+ devices, a new SFP+ module may have
- * arrived before interrupts were enabled. We need to kick off
- * the SFP+ module setup first, then try to bring up link.
+ * arrived before interrupts were enabled but after probe. Such
+ * devices wouldn't have their type identified yet. We need to
+ * kick off the SFP+ module setup first, then try to bring up link.
* If we're not hot-pluggable SFP+, we just need to configure link
* and bring it up.
*/
- err = hw->phy.ops.identify(hw);
- if (err == IXGBE_ERR_SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
- dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "failed to initialize because "
- "an unsupported SFP+ module type was detected.\n"
- "Reload the driver after installing a supported "
- "module.\n");
- ixgbe_down(adapter);
- return err;
+ if (hw->phy.type == ixgbe_phy_unknown) {
+ err = hw->phy.ops.identify(hw);
+ if (err == IXGBE_ERR_SFP_NOT_SUPPORTED) {
+ dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "failed to initialize "
+ "because an unsupported SFP+ module type "
+ "was detected.\n"
+ "Reload the driver after installing a "
+ "supported module.\n");
+ ixgbe_down(adapter);
+ return err;
+ }
}
if (ixgbe_is_sfp(hw)) {